Allowed

Ranjit Kumar @ Babloo Kumar @ Babloo v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC25 Apr 2022CR. MISC./2229/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted regular bail to two petitioners accused of murder under Sections 302/34 IPC following a fatal incident involving an electric wire. The court noted they were booked on suspicion and the cause of death remained unascertained. Bail was allowed subject to furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners granted regular bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hilsa.

Ranjit Kumar @ Babloo Kumar @ Babloo Vs The State of… — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43877 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-397 Year-2020 Thana- HILSA District- Nalanda

¶3

====================================================== INDRAJEET KUMAR Son of Late Ramdev Prasad Resident of Villlage - Pendapur, P.S. - Hilsa,Dist. Nalanda.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶8

======================================================

¶9

with CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 2229 of 2022

¶10

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-397 Year-2020 Thana- HILSA District- Nalanda ====================================================== RANJIT KUMAR @ BABLOO KUMAR @ BABLOO Son of Late Ramdev Prasad Resident of Village - Pandapur, P.s.- Hilsa, Distt.- Nalanda.

¶11

... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 43877 of 2021) For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Lovekush Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Anil Kumar Singh (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 2229 of 2022) For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Lovekush Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Satyendra Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶12

3 25-04-2022

¶13

Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and

¶14

learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, in both the cases.

¶15

The petitioners seek regular bail in connection with

¶16

Hilsa Police Station Case No. 397 of 2020, registered for the offence punishable under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43877 of 2021(3) dt.25-04-2022 2/3

¶18

Code.

¶19

The prosecution case, as per the First Information Report, is that in the morning of 14.08.2020, the husband of the informant went to attend the call of nature, but did not return and on 16.08.2020, the dead body of the informant’s husband was found lying in a field, with an electric wire, passing through the dead body.

¶20

Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are named in the First Information Report on the basis of suspicion on the ground that there was a quarrel between the grandson of the informant and the petitioners sometime back. He further submits that the post mortem examination of the dead body of the deceased was conducted, but the doctor has not found any external injury on the dead body and the cause of death has also not been ascertained and the viscera has been sent for forensic examination. He further submits that the petitioners are is in custody since 31.01.2021 and 19.03.2021 respectively and charge sheet has been submitted against them and as such there is no likelihood that the petitioners will abscond and/or tamper with the evidence.

¶21

Regards being had to the submission advanced on behalf of the parties and taking into consideration the materials

¶22

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43877 of 2021(3) dt.25-04-2022 3/3

¶23

on record and the fact that the petitioners have been made accused on the basis of suspicion only, the cause of death has not been ascertained by the doctor, they are is in custody since 31.01.2021 and 19.03.2021 respectively and charge sheet has been submitted against them, I am inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioners.

¶24

These applications are, accordingly, allowed.

¶25

Let the petitioners, above named, be released on bail, upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 1^st Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hilsa (Nalanda), in connection with Hilsa Police Station Case No. 397 of 2020.

¶26

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J.)

¶27

Prabhakar Anand/-

Ranjit Kumar @ Babloo Kumar @ Babloo v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ranjit Kumar @ Babloo Kumar @ Babloo v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sukan Yadav @ Rajendra Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Surendra Singh @ Supari Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Sunar Chaudhary @ Sunar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Dipu Rai @ Deepak Kumar Rai @ Dipu Ray Vs the State of Bihar

Mukesh Kumar Pandit Vs the State of Bihar

Prabhu Prasad Vs the State of Bihar