Allowed

Dinesh Singh v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC23 May 2022CR. MISC./22109/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court dismissed the withdrawal application of petitioner Nos. 1 and 2. The court granted anticipatory bail to petitioner No. 3, Rosi Singh, directed to surrender within four weeks, with conditions to abide by Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner No. 3 directed to surrender within four weeks and be released on bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties on conditions of Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

Dinesh Singh Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22109 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-188 Year-2020 Thana- GOGRI District- Khagaria

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Dinesh Singh, aged about 50 years, male, S/o Pulish Singh.

¶5

Savita Devi, aged about 40 years, female, W/o Dinesh Singh.

¶6

Rosi Singh @ Raushan Kumar, aged about 22 years, male, S/o Dinesh Singh.

¶7

All are R/o village- Imadpur, Bind Tola, P.S.- Gogari, District- Khagaria.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶12

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 23-05-2022 Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

¶14

Mr. Rajesh Kumar, the learned counsel for the

¶15

petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the application of

¶16

petitioner Nos. 1 and 2, namely, Dinesh Singh and Savita Devi respectively.

¶17

Permission is granted.

¶18

The application with respect to petitioner Nos. 1

¶19

and 2 is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶20

Heard the counsel for the parties.

¶21

The petitioner No. 3, namely, Rosi Singh @

¶22

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22109 of 2021(2) dt.23-05-2022 2/3

¶23

Raushan Kumar seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in connection with Gogri P.S. Case No. 188 of 2020 instituted for the offences under Sections 447, 341, 323, 504, 506, 354, 509, 307, 385, 379 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶24

The accusation in the F.I.R. is of scuffling with the informant and other members of the prosecution party. This was in retaliation to the police having been called because of an earlier occurrence.

¶25

Nobody has suffered any injury and most of the accused persons of this case have been granted anticipatory bail by different Benches of this Court.

¶26

Regard being had to the nature of accusation against petitioner No. 3, namely, Rosi Singh @ Raushan Kumar, he, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria in connection with Gogri P.S. Case No. 188 of 2020, subject to the conditions

¶27

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22109 of 2021(2) dt.23-05-2022 3/3

¶28

laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶29

The application stands disposed off accordingly.

¶30

(Ashutosh Kumar, J)

¶31

Praveen-II/-

¶32

U T

Dinesh Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dinesh Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kedar Mandal Vs The State of Bihar

Ajay Kumar Giri Vs The State of Bihar

Mubarak Ali @ Munna @ Mubarak Miya @ Mubarak Vs The State of Bihar

MD Ebrar Ansari @ MD Ebrar Alam Vs The State of Bihar

Lalo Yadav @ Laljit Yadav @ Lalu Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Ashok Yadav Vs The State of Bihar