Allowed

Jitendra Paswan v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC28 Sept 2022CR. MISC./20884/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an anticipatory bail application under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, 2018, the High Court allowed the petitioner to be released on bail upon surrender or arrest, subject to furnishing a bond and complying with CrPC conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner to be released on bail upon arrest or surrender within six weeks, subject to furnishing bonds and complying with Section 438(2) conditions.

Jitendra Paswan Vs The State of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20884 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-318 Year-2021 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Samastipur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Jitendra Paswan, Son Of Harishchandra Paswan R/O Village- Dihuli, Ward No.-10, P.S.- Angarghat, District- Samastipur

... ... Petitioner/S

Versus

The State Of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anirudh Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shaheen Begum ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶9

2 28-09-2022

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶11

The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, 2018.

¶12

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has antecedent of three cases and the allegation is of recovery of 13.110 litres of liquor from a hut from which the accused persons including the petitioner fled.

¶13

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was not arrested from the spot, as such, nothing was recovered from his conscious possession. It is next submitted that the hut does not belong to the petitioner and police in a

¶14

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20884 of 2022(2) dt.28-09-2022 2/2

¶15

mechanical manner implicated him based on the statement of Moti Giri and Ram Babu Giri.

¶16

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposes the anticipatory bail application.

¶17

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Samastipur Excise Case No.318 of 2021, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶18

The application stands allowed.

¶19

(Satyavrat Verma, J)

¶20

vikash/-

¶21

U T

Jitendra Paswan v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jitendra Paswan v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bipul Yadav @ Biplesh Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Shekhar Das @ Chandrashekhar Das @ Shikhar Das Vs The State of Bihar

Bikky Kumar @ Bikky Vs the State of Bihar

Babloo Goswami @ Babloo Kumar Goswami Vs The State of Bihar

Kopendra Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Deepak Kumar Vs the State of Bihar