Allowed

Ranjit Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC25 May 2022CR. MISC./2045/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal miscellaneous petition, the Patna High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner, who was accused of robbery under Section 392 IPC, considering the lack of incriminating evidence, no TI parade, and compliance with procedural requirements.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 20,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each.

Ranjit Kumar Vs the State of Bihar — Public Procurement and Tenders | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2045 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-368 Year-2021 Thana- SIRDALA District- Nawada

¶3

======================================================

¶4

RANJIT KUMAR S/O MAHENDRA YADAV @ MAHENDRA GOP R/o village- Hargawan, P.S.- Manpur, District- Nalanda

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Anil Chandra For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Parmanand Kumar ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 25-05-2022

¶11

Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶12

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Sirdala Police Station Case No. 368 of 2021, registered for the offences punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

The prosecution case, as per the First Information Report, is that two unknown persons, riding on two motorcycles, accosted the informant and looted away his bag, containing Rs. 62,100/-, collection register, calculator, loan form, adhar cards of the customers and his mobile phone.

¶14

Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has not committed any offence in the manner alleged and he has falsely been implicated in this case by the police with

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2045 of 2022(2) dt.25-05-2022 2/3

¶16

oblique motive. He further submits that no incriminating material has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner and the petitioner has also not been put on Test Identification Parade by the police as yet. He further submits that the petitioner is in custody since 25.08.2021, having no criminal antecedent, and charge sheet has already been submitted against him and as such there is no likelihood that the petitioner will abscond and/or tamper with the evidence.

¶17

Regards being had to the submissions made on behalf of the parties and taking into consideration the materials on record and the fact that no incriminating article has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner, the petitioner has not been put on Test Identification Parade, charge sheet has already been submitted and the petitioner is in custody since 25.08.2021, having no criminal antecedent, I am inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioner.

¶18

This application is, accordingly, allowed.

¶19

Let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail, upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 1^st Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada, in connection with Sirdala Police Station Case No. 368

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2045 of 2022(2) dt.25-05-2022 3/3

¶21

of 2021.

¶22

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J.)

¶23

Prabhakar Anand/-

¶24

U √ T √

Ranjit Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ranjit Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gautam Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Sushil Singh Vs the State of Bihar

Rahul Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Mumtaz Khan Vs The State of Bihar

Ritesh Kumar @ Ritesh Gupta @ Rahul Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ajeet Yadav Vs The State of Bihar