In a virtual hearing during the COVID-19 pandemic, the Patna High Court granted permission to a petitioner to withdraw her anticipatory bail application after she had been taken into custody in a pending criminal case.
Permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application was accorded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19283 of 2021
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-93 Year-2020 Thana- BHAPTIAHI District- Supaul
======================================================
ARCHANA KUMARI BHARTI, Gender-Female, aged about 28 years, W/o Raj Kumar Ram, Resident of Village- Nonpar, P.S.- Bhaptiyahi, Dist- Supaul.
... ... Petitioner
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR
... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Kumar Goutam, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. Shantanu Kumar, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER
2 22-01-2022
Due to the third wave of COVID-19 Pandemic, the
matter is being taken up by way of Virtual Court proceeding.
The matter has been listed under the heading ‘For
Orders’ under the orders of Hon’ble the Chief Justice.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State through Virtual mode.
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present anticipatory bail application filed on behalf of the petitioner as she has been taken into custody in connection with Bhaptiyahi P.S. Case No. 93 of 2020, pending in the court of learned S.D.J.M., Supaul.
Permission is accorded.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19283 of 2021(2) dt.22-01-2022 2/2
Accordingly, the present anticipatory bail application
filed on behalf of the petitioner is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Sudhir Singh, J)
U.K./- U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application should be granted as the petitioner was taken into custody.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Archana Kumari Bharti
The State of Bihar
Sudhir Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
