Dismissed

Riyasat Ali v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC11 Aug 2022CR. MISC./19072/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge order rejecting bail application in a gang rape case involving POCSO and SC/ST laws. Court held that since the petitioner was identified by the victim during trial and the case is nearly concluded, bail is not inclined. Directed trial court to expedite proceedings.

What did the court decide?

Prayer for bail rejected. Trial directed to proceed daily and conclude within two months.

Riyasat Ali Vs the State of Bihar — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19072 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-466 Year-2020 Thana- BHABHUA District- Kaimur (Bhabua)

¶3

======================================================

¶4

RIYASAT ALI Son of Md. Munir Alarm Resident of Bhabhua, Ward No.14, P.S.- Bhabhua, District- Kaimur (Bihar).

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Niranjan Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Sadanand Paswan ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER

¶11

4 11-08-2022

¶12

Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

¶13

Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within a period of four weeks from today.

¶14

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Bhabhua P.S. Case No. 466 of 2020 registered for the offence under Sections 376(G) of the Indian Penal Code, Section 6 of POCSO Act and Section 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST Act.

¶15

The accused/petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and is in custody since 24.07.2020.

¶16

The allegation against the petitioner is to commit gang rape upon the informant/victim girl along with other co-accused persons.

¶17

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19072 of 2022(4) dt.11-08-2022 2/3

¶19

submitted that petitioner is not named in the FIR and entire allegation is against co-accused, namely, Lav Patel @ Sheru @ Shahzad Alam, who has already been granted bail by one of the learned co-ordinate Bench of this Court through Cr. Misc. No. 38452 of 2021 dated 09.12.2021. It is also submitted that medical report is not suggesting the allegation of rape. Learned counsel while concluding argument, fairly conceded that all the charge-sheeted witnesses have already examined.

¶20

Learned APP, while opposing the prayer of bail, submitted that the case of the petitioner is distinguished to that of Lav Patel @ Sheru @ Shahzad Alam, as present petitioner was identified in open Court, by victim, during the trial, as the same person who committed rape upon her. It is also submitted that trial is almost concluded and matter is listed for argument.

¶21

In view of the submissions, as made above, as petitioner duly identified during the trial by victim/informant coupled the fact that trial of this case is almost concluded, where matter is listed for argument, this court, at present is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

¶22

Accordingly, the prayer of bail of the petitioner is rejected herewith.

¶23

Trial Court is directed to proceed with the matter, by

¶24

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19072 of 2022(4) dt.11-08-2022 3/3

¶25

taking it on board, on daily basis, so as trial may conclude expeditiously, within two months from the date of receipt of this order.

¶26

Superintendent of Police, Kaimur, is directed to produced the charge-sheeted witnesses, if any left to examined, as and when directed by the Trial Court, for expeditious disposal of trial, within specified time, as directed above.

¶27

(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J)

¶28

S.Katyayan/-

¶29

U T

Riyasat Ali v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Riyasat Ali v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Hardev Sharma Vs The State of Bihar

Smt. Raj Rani Verma Vs the Central Bureau of Investigation

Randhir Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Dheeraj Kumar @ Dhiraj Kumar Vishwakarma Vs the Union of India through Central Bureau of Investigation

Laxman Jha and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Azam Ansari Vs The State of Bihar