Allowed

Saurav Kumar @ Saurabh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC11 Mar 2022CR. MISC./18883/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This oral order granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, Saurav Kumar, charged under the Indian Penal Code. The court directed his release upon arrest or surrender within four weeks of receiving a copy of the order, subject to furnishing a bail bond with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender within four weeks, on executing a bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties.

Saurav Kumar @ Saurabh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Quashing and FIR | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18883 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-466 Year-2020 Thana- HILSA District- Nalanda

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Saurav Kumar @ Saurabh Kumar Son of Om Prakash Mehta Resident of Mohalla - Patel Nagar, P.S.- Hilsa, District - Nalanda

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Adv. Mr. Krishna Chandra, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Shailendra Kumar Singh, APP ======================================================

¶8

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶9

2 11-03-2022

¶10

Heard Mr. Sanjay Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh for the State.

¶11

The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in

¶12

connection with Hilsa P.S. Case No. 466 of 2020 dated 19.09.2020 instituted for the offences under Sections 341, 323, 504, 385, 307, 379 & 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

The petitioner and others are said to have entered the house of the Informant and the petitioner is specifically alleged to have assaulted the Informant on his head by means of an iron rod.

¶14

The petitioner has a different story to narrate.

¶15

In fact, the Informant was keeping a lustful eye on the

¶16

minor sister of the petitioner for which there had been verbal skirmish between the parties a number of times. It has been

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18883 of 2021(2) dt.11-03-2022 2/2

¶18

stated that because of that dispute, the aforesaid occurrence might have taken place but, the accusation is overly exaggerated.

¶19

A complaint also appears to have been lodged by the mother of the petitioner against the Informant of the present case which was the basis for registration of Hilsa P.S. Case No. 481 of 2020.

¶20

The injuries suffered by the Informant is stated to be simple in nature.

¶21

Regard being had to the aforesaid fact, the petitioner directed to be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, on his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hilsa (Nalanda) in connection with Hilsa P.S. Case No. 466 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

¶22

(Ashutosh Kumar, J)

¶23

rishi/-

¶24

U T

Saurav Kumar @ Saurabh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Saurav Kumar @ Saurabh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vivek Kumar Deo Vs the State of Bihar

Pankaj Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Dwarika Mahto Vs the State of Bihar

Yogendra Chaubey @ Sugga Chaubey Vs The State of Bihar

Dinesh Prasad @ Dhanesh Prasad Vs The State of Bihar

Panji Kumar @ Pankaj Kumar Vs the State of Bihar