Allowed

Raju Yadav v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC11 Jan 2022CR. MISC./18003/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Patna, through an oral order, granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Thecourt noted recovery of liquor from an open bush and release ofwas directed subject to a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail in sum of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount within six weeks of arrest or surrender.

Raju Yadav Vs the State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18003 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-190 Year-2020 Thana- JADOPUR District- Gopalganj

¶3

======================================================

¶4

RAJU YADAV, S/O PURAN YADAV R/O VILLAGE-GAMHARIA NAWADA, P.S.-YADAVPUR, DISTRICT-GOPALGANJ

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Harendra Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Tarun Prasad Mandal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 11-01-2022 Heard Mr. Harendra Prasad, learned Advocate

¶11

for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶12

The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his

¶13

arrest in connection with Yadavpur P. S. Case No. 190 of 2020, instituted for the offences under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

¶14

4.550 litres of liquor is said to have been

¶15

recovered from a bush situated behind the make-shif shop of the petitioner.

¶16

The learned Counsel for the petitioner has

¶17

submitted that he has clean antecedents and the

¶18

recovery of liquor from an open space cannot be saddled

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18003 of 2021(2) dt.11-01-2022 2/2

¶20

upon him.

¶21

On these grounds, it has been urged that the

¶22

offence under the Excise Act cannot, at all, be said to have been made out against the petitioner.

¶23

For the reasons aforesaid, the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail

¶24

bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional District and Sessions Judge-II cum Special Judge, Excise, Gopalganj, in connection with Yadavpur P. S. Case No. 190 of 2020, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶25

This petition stands allowed.

¶26

(Ashutosh Kumar, J)

¶27

skm/-

¶28

U T

Raju Yadav v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raju Yadav v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramesh Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Abhay Singh Vs the State of Bihar

Suresh Sharma Vs The State of Bihar

Chanchal Thakur Vs The State of Bihar

Urmila Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Gagandeo Yadav @ Gagandeo Rai Vs The State of Bihar