Oral order dismissing an application under Section 482 CrPC as withdrawn by the petitioner, noting that the matter had progressed beyond the framing of charges stage.
Application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17798 of 2021
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-364 Year-2017 Thana- PUPRI District- Sitamarhi
======================================================
Sudhir Kumar Das Son of Nandipat Das Village- Bhahama, P.S. - Pupri, District - Sitamarhi.
... ... Petitioner
Versus
... ... Opposite Parties
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Devendra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. J.K. Singh, APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER
2 05-05-2022 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the application under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has now become infructuous in view of the fact that the matter has gone beyond the framing of charges.
Prayer is allowed.
This application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Rajiv Roy, J)
Ravi/-
U T
Sudhir Kumar Das
The State Of Bihar
Rinku Kumari
Rajiv Roy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
