Allowed

Ravi Ranjan Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC25 Jul 2022CR. MISC./17644/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner, in judicial custody for alleged escape and document non-production during vehicle check, prayed for bail charged under Section 414 IPC. Court allowed bail with strict conditions including monthly police appearance and family surety.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted on bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties (one family member) subject to monthly police appearance and strict court attendance conditions.

Ravi Ranjan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17644 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-154 Year-2021 Thana- DEHRI TOWN District- Rohtas

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Ravi Ranjan Kumar, Son of Vinod Singh Resident of Village- Rudrapura, P.S.- Dehri (M), District- Rohtas.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Arvind Kumar Pandey, APP ======================================================

¶7

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY

¶8

ORAL ORDER

¶9

2 25-07-2022

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶11

Let the defect(s) be removed within four weeks of the

¶12

complete start of the physical Court in normal course.

¶13

The petitioner is in judicial custody in connection with Dehri (M) P.S. Case No.154 of 2021 instituted under Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

The allegation in the FIR is that when the police during the vehicle checking intercepted a motorcycle, he tried to escape from the place. He was apprehended and when he was asked to produce documents of the vehicle, he failed to provide the same. He also disclosed that the same is a stolen motorcycle. Accordingly, the motorcycle was recovered/seized and the petitioner was taken into custody.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he had no role in the matter and he was standing at the place of

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17644 of 2022(2) dt.25-07-2022 2/3

¶17

occurrence the person who left the motorcycle and escaped was left out while he was taken into custody. He submits that he is in custody since 09.12.2021 (as stated in para-14 of the bail application).

¶18

Taking into account the fact that the petitioner is in custody since 09.12.2021 and the charge-sheet has been submitted, this Court is inclined to grant him privilege of bail with certain conditions in view of the fact that he has criminal antecedent.

¶19

Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Dehri (M) P.S. Case No.154 of 2021 to the satisfaction of learned SubDivisional Judicial Magistrate, Dehri, Rohtas, subject to following conditions:

¶20

(i) one of the bailor should be the family member of the petitioner, who shall provide official document to show his/her bona fide;

¶21

(ii) the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the Trial court and failure to do so for two consecutive dates without plausible reasons will entail cancellation of his bail by the Trial court itself;

¶22

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17644 of 2022(2) dt.25-07-2022 3/3

¶23

(iii) the petitioner shall appear before the concerned police station every month for next six months to mark his presence;

¶24

(iv) the petitioner shall desist from committing any criminal offence again failing which the State shall be at liberty to steps for cancellation of his bail bonds.

¶25

With the aforesaid observations, the bail application is

¶26

allowed.

¶27

(Rajiv Roy, J)

¶28

Prakash Narayan /- U T

Ravi Ranjan Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ravi Ranjan Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shiv Kumar Singh Vs the State of Bihar

Rohit Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Md. Saddam @ Saddam Hussain Vs The State of Bihar

Indal Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sandeep Sahani @ Sandip Sahani Vs the State of Bihar

Usha Devi Vs The State of Bihar