Allowed

Md. Tauhid @ Tauhid Alam v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC13 Jul 2022CR. MISC./17583/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court modified an anticipatory bail order, extending the surrender period by four weeks for the petitioner who failed to surrender within the initial timeframe due to reasons beyond his control, after verifying the deposit of legal fees.

What did the court decide?

The period to surrender under the anticipatory bail order is extended by a further period of four weeks from today.

Md. Tauhid @ Tauhid Alam Vs the State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17583 of 2022 In

¶2

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27660 of 2019

¶3

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-618 Year-2018 Thana- JAKKANPUR District- Patna

¶4

======================================================

¶5

MD. TAUHID @ TAUHID ALAM S/o Md. Majid Alam Resident of New Millat Colony, Sector-2, Near Church Gali, P.S.- Phulwari Sharif, DistrictPatna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shailendra Kumar, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER

¶10

3 13-07-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶11

The instant application has been filed for modification

¶12

of the order dated 18.2.2020 passed in Cr.Misc. no.27660 of 2019 whereby while granting anticipatory bail to the petitioner in connection with Jakkanpur P.S. Case no. 618 of 2018, the petitioner was directed to surrender in the learned Court below within six weeks.

¶13

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that for reasons beyond his control and for the reasons as stated in the petition, the petitioner could not surrender within the time as directed by this Court and as such this petition for modification of part of the aforesaid order. It is further

¶14

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17583 of 2022(3) dt.13-07-2022 2/2

¶15

submitted that pursuant to the order dated 22.6.2022 passed in the instant case sum of Rs.20,000/- has been deposited in the Patna High Court Legal Services Committee and copy of receipt thereof has been brought on record by way of a supplementary affidavit.

¶16

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the submissions made on behalf of the petitioner and the contents of the petition, the order dated 18.2.2020 passed in Cr. Misc. No.27660 of 2019 is modified to the extent that the anticipatory bail granted to the petitioner in the said case in connection with Jakkanpur P.S. Case no. 618 of 2018, the period to surrender for the petitioner is extended by a further period of four weeks from today.

¶17

Remaining part of the aforesaid order dated 18.2.2020 shall remain unchanged.

¶18

The application stands disposed of.

¶19

(Partha Sarthy, J)

¶20

Bibhash/-

¶21

Md. Tauhid @ Tauhid Alam v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Tauhid @ Tauhid Alam v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Abhay Kumar Vs Mrs.Archana Kumari

Smt. Viveki Devi Vs Ram Bharosh Thakur and Ors.

Uma Shankar Mishra @ Dabbu Vs Leela Devi

Chandan Yadav @ Chandan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Smt.Shakuntala Devi and Ors. Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Rahul Kumar Vs the State of Bihar