Allowed

Ganauri Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC17 Aug 2022CR. MISC./17012/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner accused of assault, theft, and criminal intimidation, ordering his release within six weeks upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties, subject to statutory conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail within six weeks by furnishing a bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties each of like amount, subject to Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. conditions.

Ganauri Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17012 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-361 Year-2021 Thana- BARBIGHA District- Sheikhpura

¶3

======================================================

¶4

GANAURI KUMAR Son of Pratap Mahto Resident of Village - Kajichak, P.S. Sarmera, District - Nalanda.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, Advocate Ms. Vaishnavi Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Humayou Ahmad Khan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 17-08-2022

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

¶12

learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defects, as pointed out by the office, within a period of four weeks. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

¶14

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 379, 406, 504 & 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

The petitioner in association of other co-accused is said to have badly assaulted to one Saket Suman and tried to kill him. The reason behind the occurrence is said to be money

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17012 of 2022(2) dt.17-08-2022 2/2

¶17

dispute.

¶18

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that no such occurrence as alleged ever took place. He has been falsely implicated in this case. There is case and counter case between the parties. Both sides have sustained injury. The injury sustained by the victim is simple in nature. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.

¶19

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Barbigha P.S. Case No. 361 of 2021, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶20

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)

¶21

Trivedi/-

¶22

U T

Ganauri Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ganauri Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ganesh Rai @ Ganesh Ray Vs The State of Bihar

Ranjit Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Shiv Charan Rishi Vs the State of Bihar

Chandan Kumar @ Chandan Roy Vs The State of Bihar

Aftab Alam Vs the State of Bihar

Rajesh Ranjan @ Rajesh Kumar Vs the State of Bihar