Allowed

Shivdani Paswan @ Sheodani Paswan v. The State of Bihar through the Superintendent of Police Cum Sattion House Officer

Patna HC24 Aug 2022CR. MISC./16912/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted bail to two petitioners accused under the Prevention of Corruption Act and IPC in relation to fake job cards in an MNREGA scheme. The Court ordered their release upon deposit of bail bonds and sum towards surety.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners released on bail upon surrendering bail bond of Rs. 25,000 each with two sureties of like amount, after depositing Rs. 8,00,000 each in Court below.

Shivdani Paswan @ Sheodani Paswan Vs The State of Bihar… — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16912 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-11 Year-2021 Thana- VIGILANCE District- Patna

¶3

====================================================== SHIVDANI PASWAN @ SHEODANI PASWAN Son of Ram Nagina Paswan Resident of Village - Adarsh nagar, Collectoriate Road, P.s.- Buxar, Dsitt.Buxar. At Present Posted as Assstant Engineer, Water Resources Deptt. , Durgawati Right Bank Canal, Chenari, Rohtas.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the Superintendent of Police Cum Sattion House Officer, Vigilance Investigation Bureau. Bihar.

¶7

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶8

====================================================== with CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 21467 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-11 Year-2021 Thana- C.B.I CASE District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== MD. NOORULLAH SON OF AHMAD ALI ANSARI RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- MALMALIYA, POLICE STATION- PRATAPGANJ, DISTRICT- SUPAUL. AT PRESENT POSTED AS ASSISTANT ENGINEER, RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, KISHANGANJ

¶9

... ... Petitioner/s

¶10

Versus

¶11

THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH S. P. -CUM- STATION HOUSE OFFICER, VIGILANCE INVESTIGATION BUREAU. BIHAR

¶12

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶13

====================================================== Appearance : (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 16912 of 2022) For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ramakant Sharma, Sr. Adv. Mr.Rajesh Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Arvind Kumar, Adv.(Vigilance) (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 21467 of 2022) For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ramakant Sharma, Sr. Adv. Mr.Rajesh Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Arvind Kumar, Adv.(Vigilance) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN

¶14

ORAL ORDER

¶15

4 24-08-2022

¶16

Heard learned senior counsel for the petitioners and

¶17

learned counsel for the Vigilance.

¶18

Learned senior counsel for the petitioners undertakes to

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16912 of 2022(4) dt.24-08-2022 2/4

¶20

remove the defects within four weeks of resumption of normal court proceedings. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within stipulated period, office will place the matter before the Bench.

¶21

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 465, 467, 468, 471, 409, 120B of the IPC and sections 13(2), 13(1)(D) of the Prevention of Corruption Act.

¶22

Allegation against the petitioners is of committing embezzlement by making fake job cards and passbook in the schemes operated under MNREGA in Bhelwa Panchayat under Block Sattarkatiya of Distrcit Saharsa. It is alleged that fake withdrawals were made in the name of Government servant by opening job cards in their name. It is alleged that four beneficiaries were the Government servant in whose account illegal amount was withdrawn.

¶23

It is submitted by learned senior counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. They have been falsely implicated in this case. It is submitted that during investigation, it was found that Rs.87,084/- has been wrongly transferred in the name of another person. It is submitted that so far allegation of preparing job

¶24

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16912 of 2022(4) dt.24-08-2022 3/4

¶25

cards even for Government servant is concerned, petitioner has no role to play and it appears that accused Sanjeev Kumar Yadav, the then Programme Officer has taken photo and photo copy of the Aadhar card of the Government servant for the work of filling of soil and after that they came to know that the job cards opened in their names is wrong as they were Government servant. They neither applied for the job cards nor have made signature anywhere and petitioners has no role in the same. Learned senior counsel for the petitioners submits that according to the F.I.R., there is a loss of Government fund of Rs.82,836/- out of which Rs.42,480/- has been deposited by challan and petitioners are ready to deposit the rest amount.

¶26

Learned counsel for the Vigilance vehemently opposed the prayer for bail and submits that there is an allegation of misappropriation of Government fund.

¶27

Petitioners are agreed to deposit Rs.8,00,000/- (Rupees Eight Lakh) each in the Nazarat of the District Court.

¶28

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, since the petitioners are ready to deposit the amount, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.

¶29

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16912 of 2022(4) dt.24-08-2022 4/4

¶30

25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Vigilance P.S. Case No.11 of 2021/Spl. Vigilance P.S. Case No.05 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶31

However, bail bonds of the petitioners shall be accepted after showing the receipt of deposit of Rs.8,00,000/- (Rupees Eight Lakh) each in the Nazarat of the Court below.

¶32

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)

¶33

pallavi/-

¶34

U T

Shivdani Paswan @ Sheodani Paswan v. The State of Bihar through the Superintendent of Police Cum Sattion House Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shivdani Paswan @ Sheodani Paswan v. The State of Bihar through the Superintendent of Police Cum Sattion House Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Baidyanath Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Indu Kumari @ Indu Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Shailesh Singh @ Shailesh Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Jokhu Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Budhu Ram @ Budhu Bind Vs The State of Bihar

Sanjeev Ranjan Vs The State of Bihar