Allowed

Manju Devi v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC12 Aug 2022CR. MISC./16832/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Patna granted anticipatory bail to two petitioners in a prosecution for violating the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act involving section 30. The court allowed bail subject to specific conditions and a monetary deposit.

What did the court decide?

Enlargement on bail by furnishing bonds of Rs.25,000 each with two surepies, depositing Rs.30,000 each in Bihar Kishore Nyay Nidhi, with valid bail for six weeks.

Manju Devi Vs The State of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16832 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-265 Year-2021 Thana- MALSALAMI District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

MANJU DEVI Wife of Lallan Manjhi Resident of village - Ganj Musahathi, P.S.- Malsalami, District - Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

======================================================

¶10

with CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 21854 of 2022

¶11

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-265 Year-2021 Thana- MALSALAMI District- Patna

¶12

====================================================== BIKASH KUMAR S/o Balli Rai Resident of Mohalla- Pathar Ghat, P.s.Malsalami, District- Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 16832 of 2022) For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rajeev Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Binod Kumar (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 21854 of 2022) For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rajeev Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Mritunjay Kumar Nirala ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER

¶17

2 12-08-2022

¶18

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State through virtual court proceedings.

¶19

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

¶20

360 litres of Mahua wine has been recovered from the

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16832 of 2022(2) dt.12-08-2022 2/3

¶22

place of occurrence. Allegation against the petitioners is that they fled away from the place of occurrence after seeing the police.

¶23

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that there is no recovery from the conscious possession of the petitioners and petitioners have got no criminal antecedent as stated in paragraph-3 of the bail application. It is submitted that similarly situated another co-accused has already been enlarged on anticipatory bail by this Court vide order dated 01.07.2022, passed in Cr. Misc. No.70893 of 2021.

¶24

Petitioners are ready to deposit a sum of Rs.30,000/(rupees thirty thousand) each in Bihar Kishore Nyay Nidhi, Apna Ghar, Near Lalit Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna bearing Saving Bank Account No.35094613009, State Bank of India, Branch Name Patna Secretariat Sinchai Bhawan, Branch Code153, IFSC Code-SBIN0000153.

¶25

Taking into consideration the fact aforesaid and the fact that there is no recovery from the conscious possession of the petitioners, let petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a

¶26

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16832 of 2022(2) dt.12-08-2022 3/3

¶27

period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (rupees twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Excise, Patna City (Patna) in connection with Malsalami P.S. Case No.265 of 2021, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure as well as subject to the further conditions that:

¶28

(i) One of the bailors will be own blood relative of the petitioners, preferably, father, mother, brother, sister and/or their wife.

¶29

(ii) The petitioners shall not indulge themselves in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

¶30

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J.)

¶31

Sanjay/-

¶32

U T

Manju Devi v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manju Devi v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pranjal Kumar @ Laddu Manjhi @ Laddu Kumar Manjhi Vs The State of Bihar

Manager Rai Vs the State of Bihar

Ajay Ram Vs The State of Bihar

Ranjeet Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Vishal Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Amar Mahto Vs The State of Bihar