Allowed

Renu Devi v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC17 May 2022CR. MISC./16752/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Patna granted anticipatory bail to four petitioners facing charges of assault and criminal intimidation, releasing them on bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with sureties upon arrest, citing their age and 50% handicap as priority grounds.

What did the court decide?

Directed release of petitioners on bail upon arrest/surrender within four weeks, requiring bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties.

Renu Devi Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16752 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-227 Year-2021 Thana- SAKRI District- Madhubani

¶3

======================================================

¶4

RENU DEVI Wife of Bhogendra Jha R/o Village- Chauri, P.S.- Sakri, District - Madhubani.

¶5

Sweta Devi @ Sweta Jha Wife of Binayak Jha R/o Village- Chauri, P.S.Sakri, District - Madhubani.

¶6

Bhogendra Jha Son of Jugeshwar Jha R/o Village- Chauri, P.S.- Sakri, District - Madhubani.

¶7

Binayak Jha Son of Bhogendra Jha R/o Village- Chauri, P.S.- Sakri, District - Madhubani.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶12

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anil Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 17-05-2022

¶14

For the reason of the age and ailment of petitioner no.

¶15

3 and his being handicapped by fifty percent, this case has been given a priority hearing.

¶16

Heard Mr. Ashok Kumar Jha, learned Advocate for the petitioners and the learned APP for the State.

¶17

The petitioners seek bail in anticipation of their arrest in connection with Sakri P.S. Case No. 227 of 2021 dated 05.12.2021 instituted for the offences under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 354B, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶18

Though the accusation of assault is on all the accused persons but that is only general and omnibus. The victim has

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16752 of 2022(2) dt.17-05-2022 2/2

¶20

received two injuries, one on his little finger and the other on the parietal region, but both the injuries have been opined to be simple in nature.

¶21

There is a counter version of the occurrence, which has been lodged by petitioner no. 4, in which some of the persons from the side of the petitioners have also been injured.

¶22

It has further been submitted that prior to the aforesaid case and counter case, there was yet another case lodged by petitioner no. 3 against the informant and others vide Sakri P.S. Case No. 218 of 2021.

¶23

Considering the afore-noted background facts, the petitioners are directed to be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, on their furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani in connection with Sakri P.S. Case No. 227 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

¶24

(Ashutosh Kumar, J)

¶25

krishna/-

¶26

U T

Renu Devi v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Renu Devi v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Arvind Kumar Tiwari @ Arvind Tiwari Vs The State of Bihar

Sunil Pandit Vs the State of Bihar

Rupesh Giri Vs The State of Bihar

Dharmendra Saw @ Dharmendra Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Satyadeo Prasad Vs The State of Bihar

Ganaur Paswan Vs the State of Bihar