The anticipatory bail petition filed by the petitioner was allowed to be withdrawn. Consequently, the petition was dismissed as withdrawn by the single judge.
Permission to withdraw the petition was allowed; the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16557 of 2022
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-116 Year-2020 Thana- PATORI District- Samastipur
======================================================
RAVINDRA RAI @ RAJENDRA RAI Son of Late Ram Preet Rai Resident of Village- Araiya Purwari Tola, P.S.- Patori, District- Samastipur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Surendra Kumar Mishra For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs.Meena Singh ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER
2 04-07-2022 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to
withdraw this anticipatory bail petition.
Prayer is allowed.
This anticipatory bail petition is, accordingly,
dismissed as withdrawn.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
BKS/-
U T
Ravindra Rai @ Rajendra Rai
The State of Bihar
Prabhat Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
