Allowed

Sanjay Rai v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC17 Feb 2022CR. MISC./1648/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is an oral order wherein the Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a dowry death case, considering the constraints of the third wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Bail was initially granted on personal bond with a direction to furnish monetary bonds and sureties after normalcy is restored.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted on personal bond; direction to furnish Rs. 10,000 bond and two sureties within eight weeks after restoration of normalcy.

Sanjay Rai Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1648 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-25 Year-2020 Thana- PARSAUNI District- Sitamarhi

¶3

======================================================

¶4

SANJAY RAI Son of Sewak Rai Resident of Village - Sundargama, P.S.Parsauni, Distt.- Sitamarhi.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Bharat Lal, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs.Indu Kumari Srivastava, APP ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH

¶12

ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 17-02-2022

¶14

Due to the third wave of COVID-19 Pandemic, the

¶15

matter is being taken up by way of Virtual Court proceeding.

¶16

The matter has been listed under the heading ‘For Orders’ under the orders of Hon’ble the Chief Justice.

¶17

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State through virtual mode.

¶18

Learned Counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, within a period of four weeks after restoration of normalcy.

¶19

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Parsauni P.S. case No.25/2020 registered under Sections 304(B), 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶20

Allegation is that the accused persons including the petitioner caused death of the daughter of the informant due to

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1648 of 2022(2) dt.17-02-2022 2/3

¶22

non-fulfilment of demand of dowry.

¶23

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and there is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner is the brother-in-law of the deceased. He is separate in mess and property from the husband of the deceased. He has got no concern with the alleged occurrence. A petition has been filed by the informant in the court below, where he has retracted from his earlier statement made in the F.I.R. Said petition is Annexure 4 to the present application.

¶24

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the complaint case/F.I.R.

¶25

It is necessary to indicate here that this Court while considering the prayer made in the present anticipatory bail application has taken note of the exponential rise in number of covid cases due to outbreak of third wave of Covid-19 pandemic. Further this Court can also not lose sight of the fact that the condition of jails is not conducive and suitable to the present situation which has arisen due to the sudden rise in covid cases.

¶26

Considering the facts and circumstances, the

¶27

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1648 of 2022(2) dt.17-02-2022 3/3

¶28

petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on his personal bond to the satisfaction of Sri Rakesh Kumar, Judicial Magistrate, 1^st class, Sitamarhi in connection with Parsauni P.S. case No.25/2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶29

Once the normalcy is restored, the petitioner shall furnish bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each within a period of eight weeks to the satisfaction of the Court concerned in connection with the aforesaid case.

¶30

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶31

Narendra/-

Sanjay Rai v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjay Rai v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dharmendra Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Dip Narayan Sardar Vs The State of Bihar

Rakesh Kumar @ Danveer Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Md. Mustkim Vs The State of Bihar

Lalia Khatoon Vs the State of Bihar

Ranjana Shukla Vs the State of Bihar