Allowed

Jitendra Rathore @ Jitendra Sharma v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC18 Jul 2022CR. MISC./16382/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Hon'ble Justice Rajiv Roy allowed the bail application of the petitioner in PS Case No. 48 of 2021 under IPC sections 392, 397, and 411. The court granted bail subject to strict conditions including securing a family surety, fortnightly police appearances, and an undertaking not to tamper with evidence.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 15,000 with two sureties, subject to strict conditions regarding appearance and witness safety.

Jitendra Rathore @ Jitendra Sharma Vs the State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16382 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-48 Year-2021 Thana- TARABARI District- Araria

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Jitendra Rathore @ Jitendra Sharma S/o Shivlal Rathor Resident of VillageBinodpur, Doriyare, Ward No.-8, P.S.-Bounsi, District-Araria.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Md. Naushad Uzzoha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Parmanand Kumar, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 18-07-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

¶13

The petitioner is in judicial custody in connection

¶14

with Tarabari P.S. Case No. 48 of 2021 under sections 392, 397 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

The allegation against him is that he along with his associates intercepted the informant and relieved him of his motorcycle as also the other belongings.

¶16

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that despite the fact that the informant had explained about the personality of the accused persons who intercepted and snatched his belongings including the motorcycle. He further submits that no TIP has yet been held despite the fact that the petitioner is in custody since 22.6.2021(as stated in para-1 of the bail application). He lastly submitted that the other accused persons

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16382 of 2022(2) dt.18-07-2022 2/3

¶18

implicated in this case have since been granted the privilege of bail by a coordinate bench of this Court on 30.3.2022 in Cr. Misc. No. 51710 of 2021. Let the order be kept on record.

¶19

Taking into account the aforesaid fact including the fact that charge-sheet stands submitted and he is in custody since 22.6.2021, this Court is inclined to grant him the privilege of bail but with some strict conditions in view of the fact that he is having criminal antecedent.

¶20

Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 15,000/- (Fifteen thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-III, Araria, in connection with Tarabari P.S. Case No. 48 of 2021 subject to the following conditions:

¶21

(i) one of the bailors should be the family members of the petitioner, who shall provide official document to show his/her bona fide;

¶22

(ii) the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive dates without plausible reasons will entail his cancellation of bail by the Trial Court itself;

¶23

(iii) he shall appear before the concerned police station every fortnight for next six months to mark his presence;

¶24

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16382 of 2022(2) dt.18-07-2022 3/3

¶25

(iv) he shall in no way try to induce or promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidence, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds;

¶26

(v) the petitioner shall desist from committing any criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds.

¶27

With the aforesaid observations, the bail application is

allowed.

(Rajiv Roy, J)

Ravi/-

U T

Jitendra Rathore @ Jitendra Sharma v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jitendra Rathore @ Jitendra Sharma v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Baidyanath Sahni Vs The State of Bihar

Sonu Mahato Vs The State of Bihar

Kumud Kumar @ Sumodh Kumar @ Engineer @ Samod Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Niranjan Kewat @ Niranjan Kewal Vs The State of Bihar

Kundan Kumar @ Piluaa Vs the State of Bihar

Banti Kumar @ Kundan Vs The State of Bihar