Allowed

Rajnandan Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC3 Mar 2022CR. MISC./16085/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to two petitioners involved in a dispute over standing crops. The court noted injuries to both sides but lack of forensic assessment and denial of prior criminal record, releasing them on bail with bond conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners directed to be released on bail with bonds and sureties in the sum of Rs. 10,000 each, subject to Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

Rajnandan Yadav Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16085 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-91 Year-2019 Thana- BARABAR TOURIST District- Jehanabad

¶3

======================================================

¶4

RAJNANDAN YADAV S/o Ruplal Yadav R/o village- Pachwai, P.S.Brabar Pryatak, Bishunganj O.P., District- Jehanabad

¶5

Vijay Yadav S/o Ruplal Yadav R/o village- Pachwai, P.S.- Brabar Pryatak, Bishunganj O.P., District- Jehanabad

¶6

... ... Petitioner/s

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State of Bihar Bihar

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Upendra Kumar, Advocate Ms. Kumari Sujata Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Umesh Lal Verma, APP ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 03-03-2022 Heard Mr. Upendra Kumar, learned Advocate for the petitioners and the learned APP.

¶13

The petitioners seek bail in anticipation of their arrest in connection with Barabar Paryatan (Bishunganj) P.S. Case No. 91 of 2019 dated 05.12.2019 instituted for the offences under Sections 341, 147, 148, 149, 323, 504, 506, 307 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

An occurrence took place over reaping of standing crops in the field over which the parties have been staking their respective rival claims. In the aforesaid occurrence both sides have received injuries.

¶15

One person from the side of the prosecution has been injured but the assessment of the nature of injury has not been made for want of further medical investigation.

¶16

The nature of the injuries on the body of the petitioners also have not been assessed.

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16085 of 2021(2) dt.03-03-2022 2/2

¶18

The petitioners are agnates of the informant.

¶19

Considering the afore-noted facts and taking into

¶20

account that the petitioners do not have criminal antecedents, they are directed to be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, on their furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/(Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate 1^st Class, Jehanabad in connection with Barabar Paryatan (Bishunganj) P.S. Case No. 91 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

¶21

(Ashutosh Kumar, J)

¶22

krishna/-

¶23

U T

Rajnandan Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajnandan Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jitendra Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Kamlesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Birendra Kumar Mishra Vs The State of Bihar

Manish Kumar @ Manish Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Vikram Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Faudar Jha Vs the State of Bihar