Allowed

Sintu Kumar @ Sintu Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC19 Jul 2022CR. MISC./15639/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner, who was in judicial custody charged under the IPC and Arms Act. Considering similar bail granted to a co-accused and custodial duration, the court released him pending trial subject to strict conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail bond of Rs. 15,000 with two sureties subject to strict attendance and conduct conditions.

Sintu Kumar @ Sintu Yadav Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15639 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-308 Year-2021 Thana- SHEKHPURA District- Sheikhpura

¶3

======================================================

¶4

SINTU KUMAR @ SINTU YADAV Son of Late Rajendra Yadav Resident of village - Audhe, P.S.- Sheikhpura (O.P. Hathiyawan), District - Sheikhpura.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar Bihar

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vijay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 19-07-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, State and learned counsel for the State.

¶12

Let the defect(s), if any, as pointed out by the office be removed within four weeks.

¶13

The petitioner is in judicial custody in connection with Sheikhpura (Hathiyawan O.P.) P.S. Case No. 308 of 2021 for the offences under Sections 323, 307, 506 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

¶14

The informant has alleged in the FIR is that three accused persons including the petitioner herein resorted to indiscriminate firing, one of which hit the right leg of the informant and he was injured. When the family members of the informant and the other people assembled there, the accused persons fled away from the place of occurrence.

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15639 of 2022(3) dt.19-07-2022 2/3

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that omnibus allegation has been made against the accused persons including the petitioner herein. He further submits that the petitioner is in custody since 01.11.2021(as stated in paragraph9 of the bail application). He lastly submits that one of the similarly situated co-accused namely, Lalbabu Yadav @ Lala Kumar has since been granted the privilege of bail in Cr. Misc. No. 7946 of 2022 on 21.06.2022.

¶17

Let the order dated 21.06.2022 be kept on record.

¶18

Taking into account the aforesaid facts that omnibus allegation is made against the petitioner herein, charge sheet stands submitted, he is in jail since 01.11.2021 and one of the co-accused has been granted the privilege of bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court, this Court is inclined to grant him the privilege of bail.

¶19

Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 15,000/- (Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sheikhpura in connection with Sheikhpura (Hathiyawa O.P.) P.S. Case No. 308 of 2021, subject to the following conditions.

¶20

(i) one of the bailor should be the family member of

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15639 of 2022(3) dt.19-07-2022 3/3

¶22

the petitioner, who shall provide official document to show his/her bona fide ;

¶23

(ii) the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive dates without plausible reasons will entail his cancellation of bail by the Trial Court itself;

¶24

(iii) he shall appear before the concerned police station every fortnight for next six months to mark his presence;

¶25

(iv) he shall in no way try to induce or promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidence, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds;

¶26

(v) the petitioner shall desist from committing any criminal offence again failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds.

¶27

With the aforesaid observations, the bail application is

allowed.

(Rajiv Roy, J)

Jagdish/-

Sintu Kumar @ Sintu Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sintu Kumar @ Sintu Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Niranjan Kewat @ Niranjan Kewal Vs The State of Bihar

Kundan Kumar @ Piluaa Vs the State of Bihar

Banti Kumar @ Kundan Vs The State of Bihar

MD Munawwar Akhtar Vs The State of Bihar

Sonu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ankit Kumar Choudhary @ Babu Choudhary @ Ankit Kumar Vs The State of Bihar