Allowed

Rahul Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC11 Jul 2022CR. MISC./15568/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner, who was in judicial custody for alleged impersonation in an examination leading to charges of cheating and forgery, upon furnishing a bond and complying with specific conditions.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of like amount, subject to conditions regarding family surety and no further criminal offences.

Rahul Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15568 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-501 Year-2021 Thana- CIVIL LINE District- Gaya

¶3

======================================================

¶4

RAHUL KUMAR S/o Jhakhuri Yadav @ Jhakuri Yadav R/o villageHatwariya, P.S.- Amas, District- Gaya

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar Bihar

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manish Kumar No. 2 For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Lalan Kumar, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 11-07-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶13

Let the defect(s), if any, as pointed out by the office

¶14

be removed within four weeks.

¶15

The petitioner is in judicial custody in connection

¶16

with Civil Lines P.S. Case No. 501 of 2021 for the offences under Sections 419 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/10 of the Bihar Conduct of Examination Act.

¶17

The allegation in the FIR is that the petitioner was appearing in +2 District School, Gaya in place of one Anil Kumar. In course of verification, the photographs on the admit card did not tally with the petitioner and accordingly, he was subject to interrogation and later arrested.

¶18

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that for the said misdeed, he has already suffered by being in jail since

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15568 of 2022(2) dt.11-07-2022 2/2

¶20

27.11.2021 (as stated in paragraph-12 of the bail application).

¶21

Be that as it may, the charge sheet has already been submitted and the petitioner is in custody since 27.11.2021 this Court is inclined to grant him the privilege of bail.

¶22

Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in connection with Civil Lines P.S. Case No. 501 of 2021, subject to the following conditions.

¶23

(i) one of the bailor should be the family member of the petitioner, who shall provide official document to show his/her bona fide ;

¶24

(ii) the petitioner shall desist from committing any criminal offence again failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds.

¶25

With the aforesaid observations, the bail application is

allowed.

(Rajiv Roy, J)

Jagdish/-

U T

Rahul Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rahul Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Maniraj@ Manish Singh @ Mani Raj Vs The State of Bihar

Munna Ray Vs the State of Bihar

Uday Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Bambam Kumar @ Bambam @ Bamma Vs The State of Bihar

Mukesh Singh @ Munna Singh @ Munna Vs The State of Bihar

Vivek Ro @ Ajara Janson @ Ajara Janson Ro Vs The State of Bihar