Allowed

Kishan Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC29 Aug 2022CR. MISC./15564/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted bail to a petitioner in judicial custody facing charges under Sections 363, 366(A), and 34 of the IPC. The court noted a discrepancy between the FIR and the victim's 164 Cr.P.C. statement regarding the abduction, citing the lack of criminal antecedents as key factors.

What did the court decide?

Release of petitioner on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties subject to appearance conditions.

Kishan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15564 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-428 Year-2021 Thana- PAROO District- Muzaffarpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

KISHAN KUMAR S/o- Nawal Ram Resident of - Vill - Paroo Babu Tola, P.S. - Paroo, Distt. - Muzaffarpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Chandra Sen Prasad Singh, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 29-08-2022

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

¶13

Let the defect(s), if any, as pointed out by the office be removed within four weeks.

¶14

The petitioner is in judicial custody in connection with Paroo P.S. Case No. 428 of 2021 for the offences under Sections 363, 366(A) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

As per the FIR, the allegation against the petitioner is that he along with other accuseds picked up the girl on his shoulder and dumped her in a four wheeler and fled away with her.

¶16

In this case, case diary was called for on 11.07.2022 which has since been received. The counsel for the petitioner submits that a bare perusal of statement made by the victim girl

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15564 of 2022(3) dt.29-08-2022 2/3

¶18

under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. narrates a different version that when the accused persons including the petitioner herein picked her up on his shoulder and tried to take her away, she raised ‘ hulla’ whereafter they fled away. She came to her home and informed her mother. Thereafter, the family members of the victim girl went to make complaint before the family of the petitioner where it is alleged that they resorted to ‘ marpit ’.

¶19

Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the two versions in the FIR and under section 164 Cr.P.C. statement of the victim girl does not match with each other and he being in custody since 31^st of October, 2021 (as stated in paragraph-16 of the bail application) as also the fact he does not have criminal antecedent, deserve bail

¶20

Taking into account the aforesaid fact of different version in the FIR as well as section 164 Cr.P.C. statement as also the fact that he is in custody since 31.10.2021 and he has no criminal antecedent, this Court is inclined to grant him the privilege of bail.

¶21

Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of ACJM 3^rd (West), Muzaffarpur in connection with Paroo P.S. Case No. 428 of

¶22

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15564 of 2022(3) dt.29-08-2022 3/3

¶23

2021, subject to the following conditions.

¶24

(i) one of the bailor should be the family member of the petitioner, who shall provide official document to show his/her bona fide ;

¶25

(ii) the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive dates without plausible reasons will entail his cancellation of bail by the Trial Court itself;

¶26

(iii) he shall appear before the concerned police station every fortnight for next six months to mark his presence;

¶27

(iv) the petitioner shall desist from committing any criminal offence again failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds.

¶28

Nothing recorded in the present bail application will be taken into consideration at the time of trial as the same has been observed in the bail purposes only.

¶29

With the aforesaid observations, the bail application is

allowed.

(Rajiv Roy, J)

Jagdish/-

U T

Kishan Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kishan Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nain Devi @ Naina Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Suraj Kumar@ Abhishek Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Rambharosh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Thag Sah @ Suresh Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Ajeet Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Samir @ Samir Vs the State of Bihar