Allowed

Saroj Tripathi v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC29 Aug 2022CR. MISC./13677/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court granted bail to the petitioner apprehending arrest in a Section 386 IPC case, directing surrender within six weeks and bail via bond with sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner to surrender within six weeks and be enlarged on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate

Saroj Tripathi Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13677 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-78 Year-2021 Thana- SAHPUR District- Bhojpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

SAROJ TRIPATHI Son of Triloki Tripathi Resident of Village- Bilauti, P.S.Shahpur, District- Bhojpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rajesh Kumar Mishra For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ramchandra Singh ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 29-08-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶12

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence under Section 386 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

As per the prosecution case, this petitioner is alleged to have used indecent language against informant and thereafter, threatened her to face dire consequences, if any member of her family files nomination in the panchayat election.

¶14

It is submitted on behalf of petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case only with a view to harass and humiliate. No mobile whatsapp call was given by this petitioner to informant. Entire allegation is based on oral evidence and during course of investigation, no evidence has come against this petitioner.

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13677 of 2022(3) dt.29-08-2022 2/2

¶16

Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the bail

¶17

petition.

¶18

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioner, in the event of his arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M. 1^st Bhojpur, Ara in connection with Shahpur (Karnamepur) P.S. Case No. 78 of 2021, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶19

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)

¶20

anay/-

¶21

U T

Saroj Tripathi v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Saroj Tripathi v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sikandar Mallah Vs The State of Bihar

Niraj Mahton @ Niraj Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Santosh Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Bikki @ Totarahwa @ Viccy Saw Vs the State of Bihar

MD Anwar @ Rikku Vs the State of Bihar

Brahmdeo Rajak Vs the State of Bihar