Allowed

Fahim Khan v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC15 Jul 2022CR. MISC./13041/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner, a driver charged with illegal liquor trade. The court held that since the recovery was not from the petitioner's conscious possession and he is from a clean background, bail is appropriate upon furnishing a bond with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner is directed to be released on bail upon furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount.

Fahim Khan Vs The State of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13041 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-2 Year-2022 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Gopalganj

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Fahim Khan Son of Rahim Khan Resident of Village- Danapur, P.S.Manjhagarh, District- Gopalganj.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Baijnath Sah, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Atul Chandra, APP ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER

¶10

3 15-07-2022

¶11

Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State through virtual Court proceedings.

¶12

Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within a period of four weeks from today.

¶13

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Excise Case No. 02 of 2022 registered for the offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018.

¶14

The accused/petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and is in custody since 04.01.2022.

¶15

The allegation against the petitioner is to be engaged in illegal trade of illicit liquor, where, there is recovery of 137.160 litre of foreign wine from vehicle.

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13041 of 2022(3) dt.15-07-2022 2/3

¶17

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that the recovery from a vehicle that petitioner was driver also occupied by other co-accused persons, it cannot be said that recovery is made from conscious physical possession of the petitioner, who is a man of clean antecedent. While concluding the argument, it has been submitted that investigation has been completed, charge-sheet has been submitted and, as such, there is no chance of tampering with the evidence.

¶18

Learned APP, while opposing the prayer of bail, fairly conceded the fact that alleged vehicle was occupied by the other co-accused persons also.

¶19

Considering the facts and circumstances as mentioned above, as recovery of illicit liquor from the vehicle it cannot be said that recovery is made from the conscious physical possession of the petitioner, who is driver. It is submitted that petitioner is a man of clean antecedent coupled with the fact that charge-sheet has already been submitted in this case, let the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail in connection with Excise Case No. 02 of 2022 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.D.J.-IV-

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13041 of 2022(3) dt.15-07-2022 3/3

¶21

cum-Special Excise Judge, Court No.2, Gopalganj, subject to the following conditions:

¶22

“(i) Accused/Petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be physically present on each and every date before the Trial Court till conclusion of the trial and exemption from physical appearance be allowed by the Trial Court, only on medical ground of the petitioner duly supported by the documents.

¶23

(ii) That one of the bailors shall be Ashfak Ahmad, who is the cousin of the petitioner and deponent of the present bail petition.”

¶24

(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J)

¶25

S.Katyayan/ R.S.Sen/-

¶26

U T

Fahim Khan v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Fahim Khan v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Brajesh Singh @ Bambhola Singh Vs the State of Bihar

Om Prakash Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Navlesh Yadav @ Navlesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Harpindar Singh Vs the State of Bihar

Jitendra Ray Vs The State of Bihar

Ram Bharos Ray @ Ram Vrosa Ray Vs the State of Bihar