Allowed

Md.Sadam v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC8 Mar 2022CR. MISC./12590/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Patna granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in an N.D.P.S. Act case where the only incriminating material was the confession of an arrested accomplice, with no other evidence connecting the petitioner to the offence.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner is directed to be released on bail upon arrest or surrender within four weeks, by furnishing bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.

Md.Sadam Vs the State of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12590 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-169 Year-2020 Thana- RAMGARH District- Kaimur (Bhabua)

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Md. Sadam, Son of Pitai Gaddi, aged about 34 yeares, Male, Resident of Village- Islamganj Mohania, P.S.- Mohania, Distt- Kaimur at Bhabua.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rajani Kant Pandey, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Ms Asha Devi, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

6 08-03-2022

¶13

Heard Mr. Rajani Kant Pandey, learned Advocate for

¶14

the petitioner and Ms. Asha Devi for the State.

¶15

The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in connection with Ramgarh P.S. Case No. 169 of 2020 dated 05.08.2020 instituted for the offences under Sections 8/20(b)(ii) (A)/21(a) of the N.D.P.S. Act.

¶16

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that one Gaya Ram was arrested with 600 grams of Ganja and the petitioner is sought to be prosecuted in this case on the basis of confession of aforesaid Gaya Ram.

¶17

Except for the confession of the arrested accused person, there is no other material to connect the petitioner with the offence.

¶18

The petitioner earlier was made accused in a case of

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12590 of 2021(6) dt.08-03-2022 2/2

¶20

Section 307 IPC but, in that case, he has been granted bail.

¶21

Regard being had to the aforestated facts, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, on his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sessions Judge cum Special Judge, Kaimur at Bhabua in connection with Ramgarh P.S. Case No. 169 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

¶22

(Ashutosh Kumar, J)

¶23

rishi/-

¶24

U T

Md.Sadam v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md.Sadam v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Narendra Prasad Singh @ Tej Narayan Singh @ Tej Narayan Prasad Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Bantu Ram @ Bittu Ram @ Bittu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Bipin Kumar Sharma Vs the State of Bihar

Salimu Khan @ Salimudin Khan Vs the State of Bihar

Md. Israil Vs The State of Bihar

Amit Kumar @ Kare Singh Vs the State of Bihar