Allowed

Sabita Rani v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC2 Aug 2022CR. MISC./12145/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner, a female accused facing charges related to banking embezzlement. The court directed removal of procedural defects and set bail conditions including a monetary security and submission of sureties within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner to be released on bail with bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties upon arrest or surrender within four weeks.

Sabita Rani Vs the State of Bihar — Cheque Dishonour | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12145 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-107 Year-2020 Thana- CHHATAUNI District- East Champaran

¶3

====================================================== SABITA RANI W/O SHRI MUKESH KUMAR SINHA MOHALLA DHARMSAMAJ CHOWK, IN FRONT OF DHARMSAMAJ MIDDLE SCHOOL, P.O MOTIHARI, P.S CHHATAUNI, DISTRICT-EAST CHAMPARAN.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Shri Prakash Srivastava For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Shakir Ahmad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY

¶8

ORAL ORDER

¶9

10 02-08-2022

¶10

The learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to

¶11

remove all the defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter within one month.

¶12

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶13

The petitioner apprehends her arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 467, 468, 406, 420/34 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code, registered in connection with Chhatauni P.S.Case No. 107 of 2020.

¶14

As per allegation, the husband of the petitioner, who was Branch Manager of Pakridayal Cooperative Bank, had withdrawn money deposited by the farmers for their Kisan Credit Accounts and transferred in the bank account of his brother Rupesh Kumar and his wife, the present petitioner.

¶15

The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the entire allegation is on Mukesh Kumar Sinha and on

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12145 of 2021(10) dt.02-08-2022 2/2

¶17

similar allegation his brother Rupesh Kumar has been granted anticipatory bail. He has submitted further that the petitioner is a lady and has no criminal antecedent.

¶18

Considering the above facts and circumstances and also considering the fact that co-accused Rupesh Kumar has been granted anticipatory bail, let the petitioner above-named, in the event of her arrest or surrender within four weeks from the date of communication of this order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Motihari in connection with Chhatauni P.S.Case No. 107 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P.C.

¶19

Office shall ensure that all defects are removed by the petitioner within the stipulated time as provided hereinabove, failing which the matter shall be brought to the notice of this Court.

¶20

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)

¶21

HR/-

¶22

U T

Sabita Rani v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sabita Rani v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Guddu Mishra @ Mayank Mishra @ Mayank Shekhar Mishra Vs the State of Bihar

Munna Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Baleshwar Prasad Singh @ Baleshwar Prasad Vs the State of Bihar

Rafia Nagma Vs The State of Bihar

Ajit Singh @ Ajit Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar