An oral order where the High Court dismissed a petition seeking quashing of a criminal order because the petitioners applied for withdrawal with liberty to raise points before the trial court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11344 of 2021
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-7 Year-2019 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Sitamarhi
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. B. N. Pandey, Advocate Mrs. Shweta Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. APP For the Opp. Party No.2 : Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER
3 01-09-2022 Heard Mr. B. N. Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the Opp. Party No.2 and the learned APP for the State.
Learned counsel for the petitioners fairly submits that
by invoking inherent jurisdiction of this Court, the petitioners sought quashing of order dated 13.08.2019 whereby the learned
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11344 of 2021(3) dt.01-09-2022 2/2
Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sadar, Sitamarhi took cognizance for the offence under Sections 498(A), 379, 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act against the petitioners in connection with Sitamarhi Mahila P.S. Case No. 07 of 2019, arising out of Complaint Case No. 227 of 2019, however, during the pendency of this application, the charges have been framed and as such he seeks permission to withdraw the present application with liberty to raise all the points before the learned trial court.
In view of the submissions made on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioners, the present application stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioners to raise all the points before the learned trial Court.
(Harish Kumar, J)
uday/-
U
Sanjay Paswan and others
The State of Bihar
Rajni Kumari
Harish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
