The High Court of Patna dismissed the petitioner's application for anticipatory bail in PS Case No. 463 of 2020. The court held that recovery of arms from the petitioner's house indicated joint involvement beyond his son, negating the case for bail.
Application for anticipatory bail dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 11028 of 2021
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-463 Year-2020 Thana- GHOSI District- Jehanabad
====================================================== Ran Vijay Sharma @ Ran Vijay @ Lal Sharma, aged about 60 years, Male, Son of Kamla Singh @ Kamla Sharma, Resident of Village - Damaua @ Domaua, P.S.- Ghosi, District- Jehanabad.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ravi Shanker Pankaj, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Akshay Lal Pandit, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA ORAL ORDER
3 07-01-2022
Heard the parties through video conferencing.
The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in connection with Ghosi P.S. Case No. 463 of 2020 dated 11.10.2020 instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 414, 420,468,386,341 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1-b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.
Taking into consideration that arms and ammunitions have been seized from the house of the petitioner as has come from the order passed by the learned Additional Sessions JudgeV, Jehanabad, It cannot be said that it is only the son, who is involved in the arms dealing, no case for anticipatory bail is
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11028 of 2021(3) dt.07-01-2022 2/2
made out.
This application is dismissed.
(Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J)
Anand Kr.
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner in connection with the offences under IPC and Arms Act.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Ran Vijay Sharma @ Ran Vijay @ Lal Sharma
The State of Bihar
Sanjeev Prakash Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
