In bail application, High Court granted release to petitioner on furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 with sureties after framing of charges pending trial for commuting luggage theft by snatching mobile phone from train.
Released on bail after framing of charges by furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 with sureties subject to conditions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10791 of 2022
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-46 Year-2021 Thana- DANAPUR RAIL P.S. District- Patna
======================================================
JIMMI @ JIMIANND @ JIMMI PRASAD S/o Putul @ Jeet Prasad Resident of Bari Khagaul, P.S.- Khagaul, District- Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Abhimanyu Deo, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs. Sangeeta Sharma, APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER
2 12-07-2022
Let the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, be
removed within a period of four weeks from today.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Danapur Rail P.S. Case No. 46/2021 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 392 of the Indian Penal Code.
As per prosecution case, that Shambhu Yadav gave his fardbeyan before the A.S.I., Prayagraj Junction Police Station, Prayagraj on 27.03.2021 alleging therein that on 26.03.2021, the informant was travelling from Train No. 09484 from Baidyanath Dhaam Express to his home town. At about 1 P.M., one person opened the door of that bogie and another person came inside the train and snatched the mobile phone of the informant and
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10791 of 2022(2) dt.12-07-2022 2/3
jumped down from the train and the first person remained standing at the door. Later the other people of the coach also gathered and everyone asked about this incident, then apprehended person disclosed his name as co-accused Rikki Sinha and the name of the escapee as Jimmi. The informant along with the other people of the coach caught him and handed over him to the concerned station.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in custody since 15.06.2021. Petitioner bears criminal antecedent of four cases of similar nature. Charge-sheet has already been submitted there is no likelihood of tampering with the prosecution evidence. Learned counsel for the petitioner furthers submits that the name of the present petitioner has been disclosed by the apprehended co-accused whose name is Rikki Sinha. The petitioner is not apprehended on the spot.
The learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, period of custody, nature of allegation, charge sheet has already been submitted there is no likelihood of tampering with the prosecution evidence and also taking into consideration the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10791 of 2022(2) dt.12-07-2022 3/3
material available on record, let the petitioner above named be released on bail after framing of charges on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of J.M., Railway, Patna in connection with Danapur Rail P.S. Case No. 46/2021, subject to following conditions:-
(i) One of the bailors shall be either father or mother or sister or brother or wife or the person who has sworn the affidavit in bail application.
(ii) Petitioner will co-operate in trial and will remain present on all dates and absence for two consecutive dates would be a ground for cancellation of bail by the learned Trial court itself.
(iii) If the petitioner tamper with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
(Alok Kumar Pandey, J)
amitkr/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail in connection with offenses under Section 392 IPC.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Jimmi @ Jimiannd @ Jimmi Prasad
The State of Bihar
Alok Kumar Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
