Allowed

Kamal Kumar Yadav v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC22 Jul 2022CR. MISC./10208/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted bail to the petitioner in a police case involving possession of foreign liquor and compound offences. The court held that recovery was from the vehicle, not the petitioner's conscious physical possession, and directed release on bail with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail with a bond of Rs.10,000 and two sureties of like amount, subject to appearance conditions.

Kamal Kumar Yadav Vs the State of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10208 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-211 Year-2021 Thana- MADHUBAN District- East Champaran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Kamal Kumar Yadav S/o- Jayram Rai Resident of Village- Bhawarua, P.S.Madhuban, District- East Champaran.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shashi Shekhar Tiwary, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sharma, APP ======================================================

¶8

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER

¶9

3 22-07-2022

¶10

Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

¶11

petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

¶12

Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within a period of four weeks from today.

¶13

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Madhuban P.S. Case No. 211 of 2021 registered for the offence under Sections 272, 273, 120(B), 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 30(a), 36, 41(i) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

¶14

The accused/petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and is in custody since 12.07.2021.

¶15

The allegation against the petitioner is to have in possession of 8812.260 liters of foreign wine, which was recovered from a truck bearing Registration no. HR 67 9685.

¶16

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10208 of 2022(3) dt.22-07-2022 2/3

¶18

submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is only limited to the extent that he was sitting in the vehicle, from where the alleged recovery of illicit liquor was made and nothing surfaced during the course of investigation, which may suggest that petitioner is aware of the illegal consignment of illicit liquor loaded in the vehicle, as such, it cannot be said that recovery of illicit liquor is from the conscious physical possession of the petitioner. While concluding the argument, it is submitted that petitioner is a man of clean antecedent and, moreover, investigation in this case is complete for which chargesheet has been submitted, as such, there is no chance of tampering with the evidence.

¶19

Learned APP appearing on behalf of the State, while opposing the prayer of bail, fairly conceded that this is not a case of recovery of illicit liquor from the physical possession of the petitioner.

¶20

Considering the facts and circumstances as mentioned above, as recovery cannot be said from the conscious physical possession of the petitioner, who is a man of clean antecedent coupled with the fact that chargesheet has already been submitted, let the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail in connection with Madhuban P.S. Case No.

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10208 of 2022(3) dt.22-07-2022 3/3

¶22

211 of 2021 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 8^th Sessions Judge-cum-2^nd Special Judge of Excise Act, Motihari/concerned Court, subject to the following conditions:

¶23

“(i) Accused/Petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be physically present on each and every date before the Trial Court till conclusion of the trial and exemption from physical appearance be allowed by the Trial Court, only on medical ground of the petitioner, duly supported by the documents.

¶24

(ii) That one of the bailors shall be Anil Kumar, who is the cousin brother of the petitioner and deponent of the present bail petition.”

¶25

(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J)

¶26

Ankit/Shweta/-

¶27

U T

Kamal Kumar Yadav v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kamal Kumar Yadav v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sanjay Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Indrajeet Kumar Rai @ Indrajeet Rai Vs the State of Bihar

Pradeep Ram Vs The State of Bihar

Akhilesh Kumar Gour @ Akhilesh Kumar Gond Vs The State of Bihar

Gurjit Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Sri Ram Sahni Vs The State of Bihar