Ritik Singh v. The State of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
The court in Criminal Miscellaneous No.10193 of 2022 considered a bail application under Sections 302/34 IPC. Finding the accusation serious and supported by postmortem evidence, the court refused bail but directed the trial court to expedite proceedings.
What did the court decide?
Bail prayer stands rejected.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10193 of 2022
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-396 Year-2021 Thana- ARA NAGAR District- Bhojpur
======================================================
RITIK SINGH Son of Harendra Kumar Singh @ Harendra Singh Resident of Village- Majhawan (Devnagar), Police Station- Ara Town, District- Bhojpur, Ara.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Shankar Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Anuj Kumar Shrivastava ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER
3 18-10-2022
Let the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, be removed within a period of four weeks from today.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner accused under Sections 302/34 IPC.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Ritik Singh
- respondent
The State of Bihar
Coram
Allok Kumar Pandey
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court