Ms. N could not be traced out. Let us, therefore, examine evidence of the prosecution in order to find out whether Ms. N was proved to be deceitfully enticed by the accused on the pretext of marrying her. Considering the nature of offence which is abduction for the purpose of compelling the victim women to marry with any person and that of commission of rape on her, fate of the prosecution case to a large extent hinges on the testimony of the victim. It is in evidence of PW 12 Ms. N that the incident in question took place at about 5:00 PM. At that time her grandfather as well as her mother PW 8 Mrs. M were present in the house. She testified that the accused came to her house and informed her that he has arranged a job for her and she will have to sign on the requisite documents for getting employment. The accused did not allow her to inform this fact to her mother. She further deposed that then she disclosed this fact to her grandfather who could not hear it as he is an old person. Then, according to PW 12 Ms. N, the accused took her by walk to a bamboo hut where he had kept his motorcycle. By his motorcycle, the accused then took her to Murliganj for signing the documents. Thereafter, the accused took her to Madhepura. In the evening hours of that day, the accused took her to one room where one another person was also present. As per the
