Allowed

Arvind Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC21 Dec 2022CR. APP (SJ)/488/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this appeal against an order denying anticipatory bail, the Patna High Court allowed the appeal, quashed the refusal order, and directed the release of appellants on bail upon furnishing a bond and sureties within six weeks.

What did the court decide?

Impugned order set aside; appellants directed to be released on bail with bond of Rs.25,000 each and two sureties within six weeks.

Arvind Yadav Vs The State of Bihar — Caste Atrocities | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.488 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-457 Year-2019 Thana- GAYA MUFASIL District- Gaya

¶3

======================================================

¶4

ARVIND YADAV S/O BILASH YADAV R/o village- Chhotki Nima, P.S.Moffassil, District- Gaya

¶5

Mukhiya Yadav S/o Sanjay Yadav R/o village- Chhotki Nima, P.S.Moffassil, District- Gaya

¶6

Sanjay Yadav S/o Ram Prit Yadav R/o village- Chhotki Nima, P.S.Moffassil, District- Gaya

¶7

Baudha Yadav S/o Ramashish Yadav R/o village- Chhotki Nima, P.S.Moffassil, District- Gaya

¶8

... ... Appellant/s

¶9

Versus

¶10

The State of Bihar

¶11

Soni Kumari Wife of Dinesh Paswan Resident of village-Chhoki Nima,P.SMoffassil,District-Gaya

¶12

... ... Respondent/s

¶13

====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Manish Kumar No2, Adv For the Respondent/s : Mr. Binay Krishna, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER

¶14

3 21-12-2022 Heard learned counsel for the appellants and learned Special Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶15

Office pointed out that the notice has been validly served upon the respondent no.2, but nobody appears on her behalf.

¶16

This is an appeal under section 14(A) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter in short referred to as the ‘SC/ST Act’) against the refusal of prayer for anticipatory bail vide order dated 15.02.2020, passed by learned Exclusive Special Judge, SC/ST

¶17

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.488 of 2022(3) dt.21-12-2022 2/3

¶18

Act, Gaya in connection with Moffasil P.S. Case no.457 of 2019, registered under sections 341, 342, 323, 504, 506, 354, 307, 147 and 149 of the IPC and sections 3(i)(r)(s), 3(2)(va) of the SC and ST Act, Gaya.

¶19

The allegation against the appellants is that they alongwith other co-accused persons assaulted respondent no.2 and his brother while they were going to attend shradh ceremony of their maternal grandfather. It is also alleged that the accused persons abused the informant by taking her caste name.

¶20

It is submitted by learned counsel for the appellants that the appellants are innocent and have not committed any offence. No such occurrence as alleged ever taken place. Appellants have been falsely implicated in the case with frivolous allegation. There is no specific overt act against the appellants. He submits that both the parties are co-villagers and there is a long dispute with respect to drainage is going on between them. He further submits that several similarly situated co-accused persons have been granted anticipatory bail by a co-ordinate bench of this court vide order dated 22.02.2021 passed in Cr. App (SJ) No.1263 of 2020. Appellants have no criminal antecedent.

¶21

Learned Spl. PP for the State opposed the prayer for

¶22

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.488 of 2022(3) dt.21-12-2022 3/3

¶23

anticipatory bail.

¶24

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the appellants named above, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Exclusive Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Gaya in connection with Moffasil P.S. Case no.457 of 2019, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶25

Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and this appeal is allowed.

¶26

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)

¶27

shikha/-

¶28

U T

Arvind Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arvind Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vikash Kumar @ Vikesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Rajesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Imran Zaki @ Banty Vs the State of Bihar

Surendra Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Punyadeo Singh Vs the State of Bihar

Ranjit Pandey @ Menu Pandey Vs the State of Bihar