The Single Judge allowed the appellants to withdraw the criminal appeal under the SC/ST Act, 1989. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn on 21-09-2022 by an oral order.
Permission to withdraw the appeal accorded; appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.343 of 2022
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-914 Year-2021 Thana- HAJIPUR SADAR District- Vaishali
======================================================
... ... Appellant/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Appellant/s : Mr. Mrityunjay Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Binay Krishna, Spl.P.P.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the appellants seeks permission
to withdraw this appeal.
Permission is accorded.
Accordingly, this appeal, under Section 14-A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, for setting aside the order dated 13.01.2022, passed by the learned Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with A.B.P. No. 3145 of 2021, arising out of Hajipur Sadar P.S. Case No. 914 of 2021, stands dismissed as withdrawn.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
Kundan/-
U T
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Amit Kumar and Ors.
State of Bihar
Satyavrat Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
