Allowed

Abhimanu Kumar Singh @ Abhimanu Singh v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC6 Jul 2022CR. APP (SJ)/326/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court set aside the bail refusal order and granted bail to the appellant, a cuckoldry convict alleged to have injured a victim's eye during a cricket dispute, directing his release upon furnishing bonds and complying with trial conditions.

What did the court decide?

Appellant released on bail to Special Judge SC/ST (P.O.A.) Act, Araya, furnishing bonds with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- each.

Abhimanu Kumar Singh @ Abhimanu Singh Vs the State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.326 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-50 Year-2020 Thana- SIKARHATTA District- Bhojpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

ABHIMANU KUMAR SINGH @ ABHIMANU SINGH SON OF ARBIND SINGH R/O VILLAGE- BELDEHRI, P.S.- SIKARHATTA, DISTRICTBHOJPUR

¶5

... ... Appellant/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Suman Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sadanand Paswan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶8

7 06-07-2022

¶9

Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the

¶10

State.

¶11

The prayer for grant of bail to the appellant was earlier rejected vide order dated 20.07.2021.

¶12

The appellant is in custody since 06.06.2020. Hence, the present application renewing his prayer for bail.

¶13

The appellant is said to have fired from his weapon which hit the victim in his eye. The occurrence, however, is stated to have taken place out of a small dispute while playing the game of Cricket.

¶14

It was also pointed out by the learned counsel for the appellant that he does not have any criminal

¶15

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.326 of 2022(7) dt.06-07-2022 2/3

¶16

antecedents.

¶17

As is required, notice was issued to the informant which has appropriately been served upon him. Despite that, there is no appearance on behalf of the informant to contest this petition.

¶18

This Court had also called for a report from the court below about the stage of the case; which report indicates that till the date of sending the report, no witness had been examined in the case.

¶19

Regard being had to slow pace of trial and the custody of the appellant which is from 06.06.2020 as also the nature of accusation against him, this Court is inclined to and sets aside the order passed by the learned court below refusing the grant of bail to the appellant and directs for release of the appellant on bail on his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge SC/ST (P.O.A.) Act, Bhojpur at Ara in connection with Special Case No. 94 of 2020, arising out of Sikarhatta P.S. Case No. 50 of 2020.

¶20

The appellant, however, is directed to participate

¶21

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.326 of 2022(7) dt.06-07-2022 3/3

¶22

in the trial and he shall not leave the territorial confines of the district where the trial is to be held, without proper permission from the trial court. He shall, at the time of filing his bonds, provide his mobile telephone number, which he shall keep in operative condition till the conclusion of trial.

¶23

Any breach of the afore-noted conditions would render the bail granted to the appellant liable to be cancelled.

¶24

(Ashutosh Kumar, J)

¶25

krishna/-

¶26

U T

Abhimanu Kumar Singh @ Abhimanu Singh v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Abhimanu Kumar Singh @ Abhimanu Singh v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Madan Gopal Kyal Vs United India Insurance Company Limited

Syed Md. Najmi alias Shyed Md. Najami, Vs The State of Bihar through Sri Nilesh Ramchandra Deware, the District Magistrate, Saran at Chapra

Raja Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Santosh Kumar Vs The Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd.

Kamod Narayan Kumar, Vs The State of Bihar

Naresh Kumar @ Naresh Prasad Singh Vs The State of Bihar