Allowed

Sagir Sai v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC22 Sept 2022CR. APP (SJ)/215/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This appeal against bail rejection involved a case where a bag of crackers allegedly exploded injuring another. The High Court allowed the appeal, finding the act intentional lacked, and directed the appellant's release on bail subject to conditions under Section 437(3) CrPC.

What did the court decide?

Appellant is directed to be released on bail by furnishing a bond of Rs. 20,000 with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sessions Judge in connection with Hussainganj P.S.

Sagir Sai Vs The State of Bihar — Cheque Dishonour | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.215 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-143 Year-2021 Thana- HUSSAINGANJ District- Siwan

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Sagir Sai, Son of Late Khalil Sai, Resident of Village - Jurkan, P.S.Hussainganj, Distt.- Siwan.

¶5

... ... Appellant/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar

¶8

Parma Manjhi, son of Late Ritu Manjhi, Resident of village-Judban, P.S.Hussanganj, Dist- Siwan

¶9

... ... Respondent/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr.Arbind Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mrs.Usha Kumari 1, Spl.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 22-09-2022

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned

¶12

Spl.PP for the State.

¶13

No one has appeared on behalf of the respondent no.2 in spite of valid service of notice.

¶14

Let the defect (s), as pointed out by the office, be removed within a period of four weeks from the date of resumption of physical filing and physical removal of defect.

¶15

This is an appeal under Section 14(A)(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 against the refusal of prayer for bail vide order dated 17.11.2021 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Special Judge, Siwan in connection with

¶16

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.215 of 2022 dt.22-09-2022 2/4

¶17

Hussainganj P.S. Case No. 143 of 2021 registered for the alleged offences under Sections 307, 286 of the Indian Penal Code, Section ¾ of Explosive Substances Act and Section 3(2) (vi) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.

¶18

As per prosecution case, the appellant handed over a bag to the son of the informant who was accompanied by his kid. The bag exploded and the son and the grandson of the informant received grievous injuries.

¶19

Learned counsel for the appellant submits that no occurrence as alleged has ever taken place. The police did not find any incriminating articles though the informant alleged about bomb blast. In fact the appellant was carrying crackers in the bag as he was going to a marriage ceremony and handed over the same to the son of the informant he went to attend the nature’s call and the crackers exploded and the son of the informant got injured. It is apparent that there was no motive to kill the son of the informant and it was purely an accident. The appellant is in custody since 22.06.2021 and the charge sheet has been submitted in this case.

¶20

Learned Spl.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail of the appellant submitting that the petitioner is a habitual offender and

¶21

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.215 of 2022 dt.22-09-2022 3/4

¶22

two cases are pending against him.

¶23

Perused the records.

¶24

Having regard to the facts and circumstances and the submission made on behalf of the parties and considering the fact that apparently there appears nothing intentional in the act of the appellant to hurt the son of the informant and further considering the submission of charge sheet and the period of custody of the appellant, the appellant above named is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/(twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-I-cumSpecial Judge, Siwan, in connection with Hussainganj P.S. Case No. 143 of 2021, subject to the conditions mentioned in Section 437(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and also the following conditions:

¶25

(i) The bail bond of the appellant will be accepted only after framing of charge, if not already framed.

¶26

(ii) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the appellant.

¶27

(iii) The appellant will remain present on each and every date fixed by the court below.

¶28

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.215 of 2022 dt.22-09-2022 4/4

¶29

(iv) In case of absence on three consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail,

¶30

the bail bond of the appellant will be liable to be cancelled by the court concerned.

¶31

Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and

¶32

the appeal stands allowed.

¶33

(Arun Kumar Jha, J)

¶34

V.K.Pandey/-

¶35

AFR/NAFR	N.A.F.R.
CAV DATE	N.A.
Uploading Date	23.09.2022
Transmission Date	23.09.2022

Sagir Sai v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sagir Sai v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Satish Pandit @ Satish Kumar Pandit Vs the State of Bihar

Bittu Choudhary @ Bittu Kumar Choudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Om Prakash Kumar @ Bittu Kushwaha Vs The State of Bihar

Raunak Kumar @ Munna @ Munna Kumar @ Jaliyavasum Vs the State of Bihar

Mantu Paswan @ Muntun Paswan Vs the State of Bihar

Bachhu Ram Vs the State of Bihar