Allowed

Ramadhir Kumar @ Randhir Rai v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC20 Oct 2022CR. APP (SJ)/209/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court allowed a bail appeal against the rejection of bail for an appellant charged with murder. The court set aside the impugned order, noting the appellant's clean record, his omission from the FIR, and the lack of eye-witness evidence, directing him to be enlarged on bail with conditions.

What did the court decide?

The appellant is enlarged on bail with directions to produce a bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties and conditions for cooperation.

Ramadhir Kumar @ Randhir Rai Vs The State of Bihar — Caste Atrocities | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.209 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1 Year-2020 Thana- PATNA GRP CASE District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

RAMADHIR KUMAR @ RANDHIR RAI Son of Shivdayal Rai Resident of Village - Paharpur East, Police Station - Judawanpur, District - Vaishali.

¶5

... ... Appellant/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar Bihar

¶8

Nitesh Paswan Laxmi Paswan Resident of village- Bankatpur, P.SKhusrupur, Dist-Patna

¶9

... ... Respondent/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr.Biresh Kumar Sinha For the Respondent/s : Mr.Usha Kumari 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL JUDGMENT

¶11

Date : 20-10-2022

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned Special Public

¶13

Prosecutor for the State.

¶14

The appellant has filed the instant appeal against the order dated 17.12.2021 passed by the learned Additional District and Session JudgeIII-cum-Special Judge, SC/ST, Patna whereby and whereunder the prayer for bail of the appellant in Bail Petition No. 1442 of 2021 arising out of GRP Patna Junction P.S. Case No. 01/2020 registered under Sections 302, 201, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and charge sheet submitted adding under Section 3(ii)(v) of the SC / ST (POA) Act was rejected.

¶15

As prosecution case, the informant’s brother dead body was found at Railway track. It is alleged that the FIR named accused person and

¶16

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.209 of 2022 dt.20-10-2022 2/3

¶17

unknown concertedly committed the murder of informant’s brother by cutting neck through sharp weapon.

¶18

It is submitted by learned counsel for the appellant that appellant is in custody since 27.01.2021 and bears no criminal antecedent. Charge sheet has been submitted in the case and there is no likelihood of tampering with the prosecution evidence. He further submits that appellant is not named in the FIR. The name of the present appellant has been surfaced upon the confessional statement of co-accused namely Ukha Kumar and Sindhu Rai and Fekan Rai. FIR named co-accused Ukha Devi @ Ukha Kumari, Sindhu Rai @ Sindhu Ray, Fekan Rai @ Ashok Rai have already been granted bail vide Cr. Appeal (SJ) Nos. 20076 of 2020 and 25347 of 2020 respectively and the case of present appellant stands on better footing. Except the confessional statement of co-accused, there is nothing on record to demonstrate the complicity of the present appellant with the alleged occurrence. There is no eye witness of occurrence.

¶19

Learned Spl. P.P. for the State appeal has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail.

¶20

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, period of custody, keeping in view clean antecedent of appellant, appellant is not named in the FIR, charge sheet has been submitted in the case and there is no likelihood of tampering with the prosecution evidence, material available on record, the impugned order dated 17.12.2021 is set aside and the present

¶21

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.209 of 2022 dt.20-10-2022 3/3

¶22

appeal is allowed.

¶23

The appellant is directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Special Case No. 230 of 2021 arising out of G.R.P. Patna Junction P.S. Case No. 01 of 2021 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/ (Rupees Twenty Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-III-cum-Special Judge, SC/ST, Patna, subject to following conditions:-

¶24

(i) One of the bailors shall be either father or mother or sister or brother or wife or the person who has sworn the affidavit in bail application.

¶25

(ii) Appellant will co-operate in trial and will remain present on all dates and absence for two consecutive dates without appropriate permission, would be a ground for cancellation of bail by the learned Trial court itself.

¶26

(iii) If the appellant tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

¶27

(Alok Kumar Pandey, J)

¶28

alok/-

¶29

AFR/NAFR	NAFR
CAV DATE	N/A
Uploading Date	22.10.2022
Transmission Date	22.10.2022

Ramadhir Kumar @ Randhir Rai v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramadhir Kumar @ Randhir Rai v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vishal Kumar @ Vikash Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Amar Kumar @ Amma Vs The State of Bihar

Rahul Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Guddu Yadav @ Guddu Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Gautam Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sudhir Kumar Vs The State of Bihar