The High Court granted permission to withdraw the criminal appeal as the appellant had availed the benefit of Section 167 CrPC. The appeal was consequently dismissed.
Permission to withdraw the appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.185 of 2022
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-128 Year-2020 Thana- KOPA District- Saran
======================================================
PRABHU RAI Son of Shivnath Rai Resident of Village - Patila ke Tolla, P.s.Kopa, Distt.- Chapra , Saran.
... ... Appellant/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr.Rajeev Shekhar For the Respondent/s : Mr.Binay Krishna ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER
withdraw this appeal since the appellant has been given benefit of Section 167 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
Permission is granted.
Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J.)
Sanjay/-
U T
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Prabhu Rai
State of Bihar
Jawahar Lal Ram
Anjani Kumar Sharan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
