and, thus, at this highly belated stage, cannot be allowed to revive the same. Further, an attempt was also made by him to claim salary before the Execution Court, which though has been negated, clearly indicates that the petitioner was fully aware that he had to claim for salary which was denied to him and, thus, he had raised such claim, way back in the year 1982 before the college and also later before the Execution Court. Thus, the petitioner being aware that his salary was being denied and him having moved the authorities at the relevant time itself and them not paying salary to him, the petitioner thereafter not moving the Court including the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is a clear pointer to the laches on his part which under law can be construed as waiver and estoppel against such cause and bars him now from claiming payment of salary for the said period. It is not in dispute that upon his joining, he has been paid his due salary. At this stage, learned counsel for the J.P. University was not in a position to controvert or
