Allowed

Kumar Prem Shankar v. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary

Patna HC18 Aug 2021MJC/1563/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Judicature at Patna allowed a modification application filed by the petitioner to correct a clerical error in the name and case number in an earlier writ petition and granted extension of time to appear before the appropriate authority.

What did the court decide?

Correction of name to 'Kumar Prem Shekhar' and case number to '339/2020' in the writ petition was allowed. Petitioner directed to appear on 02.09.2021.

Kumar Prem Shankar Vs The State of Bihar… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Patna HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1563 of 2021

¶2

¶3

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10832 of 2021

¶4

======================================================

¶5

Kumar Prem Shankar son of Sri Upendra Jha, resident of village Kharagbani, Ward No. 03, P.S. Babu Barhi, District Madhubani.

¶6

... ... Petitioner/s

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Registration Excise and Prohibition, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

¶9

The District Magistrte cum Collector, Madhubani.

¶10

The Superintendent of Police, Madhubani.

¶11

The Officer in Charge, Babu Barhi Police Station, Babu Barhi, DistrictMadhubani.

¶12

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Shailendra Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Vikash Kumar (S.C. 11) ======================================================

¶13

CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶14

(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR)

¶15

(The proceedings of the Court are being conducted through Video Conferencing and the Advocates joined the proceedings through Video Conferencing from their residence.)

¶16

2 18-08-2021 This application has been filed for modification in the

¶17

order dated 16.07.2021 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 10832 of 2021.

¶18

Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed this modification application, for correction in paragraph no.7 of the writ petition which reads as follows:

¶19

“7. That under the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the present case the name of the petitioner may be ordered to be corrected as Kumar Prem Shekhar in place of Kumar Prem Shankar and also ordered to be corrected as Babu Barhi P.S. Case No.

¶20

Patna High Court MJC No.1563 of 2021(2) dt.18-08-2021 2/2

¶21

339/2020 in place of Babu Barhi P.S. Case No. 338/2020 in the larger interest of justice.”

¶22

In view of the submission made by learned counsel for

¶23

the petitioner, the prayer made in para no. 7, quoted above, is allowed.

¶24

Learned counsel for the petitioner further prays that petitioner may be granted further time to appear before the concerned appropriate authority, as the earlier date fixed by this Hon’ble court has already elapsed.

¶25

As such, petitioner is directed to make himself available on 02.09.2021 at 10.30 A.M. before the concerned appropriate authority.

¶26

The judgment and order dated 16.07.2021 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 10832 of 2021 is modified to the extent indicated above.

¶27

This modification application is allowed.

¶28

(Sanjay Karol, CJ)

¶29

( S. Kumar, J)

¶30

veena/rajiv-

¶31

Kumar Prem Shankar v. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kumar Prem Shankar v. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sudheer Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Devesh Sharma Vs the State of Bihar through Chief Secretary, Patna, Bihar

Aditya Anand Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Salahuddin @ Md. Salaluddin Vs The State of Bihar

Shravan Kumar Vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, 1, Patna

Shravan Kumar Vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, I