Sidhnath Singh @Sidhnath Sharma Vs The State of Bihar

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. AC to AG ======================================================

¶14

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER

¶15

2 01-03-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondents.

¶16

The petitioner is aggrieved by exclusion of the voters from the voters list of Rajipur PACS.

¶17

In 2015, the petitioner and others were voters of Rajipur PACS, but in 2020 PACS election, petitioner and others were excluded from the voters list of the said PACS.

¶18

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that 2020 PACS election is over.

¶19

In view of the above, no positive direction can be issued in the present writ application.

¶20

Patna High Court CWJC No.3879 of 2021(2) dt.01-03-2021 2/2

¶21

However, liberty shall be available to the petitioner to approach the appropriate authority for correction in the voters list of Rajipur PACS election to be held, in future.

¶22

With the aforesaid observation, the present writ application stands disposed of.

¶23

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)

¶24

uday/-

¶25

U

Sidhnath Singh @Sidhnath Sharma v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sidhnath Singh @Sidhnath Sharma v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Usha Bharti Vs The Chairman Bihar Public Service Commission

Pramod Kumar @ Pramod Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Vishal Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Kanchan Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Renu Devi @ Renu Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Rohit Patel @ Rohit Kumar Vs The Union of India