The High Court of Patna granted permission to withdraw the writ application as the petitioner's grievance was redmitted during pendency. The application was dismissed as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the writ application granted; writ application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2666 of 2021
======================================================
Ishrat Shaheen Khanam
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Kumar Mishra For the Respondent/s : Mr.Lalit Kishore (Ag) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER
3 17-08-2021 Heard the parties concerned.
Mr. Umesh Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the
petitioner submits that during pendency of this writ application, grievane of the petitioner has been redressed. Accordingly, he seeks permission to withdraw this writ application.
Permission is granted.
This writ application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Anil Kumar Sinha, J)
S.Ali/-
U
Ishrat Shaheen Khanam
The State of Bihar
Anil Kumar Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
