Disposed

Ranju Kumari v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC1 Mar 2021CWJC/23789/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A writ petition challenging the cancellation of the petitioner's appointment as Aganbari Sewika was disposed of as not pressed, but the petitioner was granted liberty to file an appeal with the appellate authority notwithstanding the limitation issue.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed of as not pressed; liberty granted to file appeal before appellate authority within two weeks.

Ranju Kumari Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.23789 of 2018

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Ranju Kumari W/o Raju Chaudhary, R/o Vill.- Narawat post -Piyar, P.S. Prakhand-Atari, District- Gaya.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

1. The State Of Bihar through its Principal Secretary Social Welfare Department Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶7

The Principal Secretary Social Welfare Department Government of Bihar Patna.

¶8

The Director Social Welfare Department Government of Bihar Patna.

¶9

The Commissioner, Magadh Division, Gaya.

¶10

The District Magistrate , Gaya.

¶11

The District Programmer Officer, Gaya.

¶12

The Child Development Project Officer Atari Block, Gaya.

¶13

The Women's Superivisor Child Development Project Atari, Gaya.

¶14

Pooja Kumari W/o Sonu Manjhi, Gram- Madinpar, Post Piyar, P.S.- Atari District- Gaya.

¶15

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rama Kant Singh, Adv. For the State : Mr. Gyan Shankar, AC to GP-2 For the Respondent No. 9 : Mr. Madhusudan Kumar, Adv. ======================================================

¶16

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER

¶17

2 01-03-2021

¶18

The present writ petition has been filed seeking to challenge the order dated 20.11.2018 passed by the District Programme Officer, Gaya whereby and whereunder the selection and appointment of the petitioner on the post of Aganbari Sewika for Aganbari Centre Narawat Bhui Tola Code-94 in Atari Block, District-Gaya has been cancelled.

¶19

Patna High Court CWJC No.23789 of 2018(2) dt.01-03-2021 2/2

¶20

At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty to file appropriate appeal before the appellate authority against the order dated 20.11.2018.

¶21

Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed of as not pressed, however, with liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal before the appellate authority and in case, appropriate appeal is filed within a period of two weeks from today, the appeal of the petitioner shall be decided on merits without the appellate authority being impeded by the issue of limitation.

¶22

It is needless to state that in case, the said appeal is filed by the petitioner within a period of two weeks from today, the same shall be disposed of within a period of three months, thereafter, after giving appropriate opportunity to the StateRespondents as also to the Private Respondent No. 9, namely, Pooja Kumari.

¶23

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)

¶24

Ajay/- U

Ranju Kumari v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ranju Kumari v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Usha Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Sudha Devi Vs The Principal Secretary

Most. Abda Khatoon Vs The State of Bihar

Ranjan Kumar Chauhan, Vs The State of Bihar

Arun Kumar Singh Vs The Union of India

Sita Ram Gupta Vs The Union of India