The High Court of Judicature at Patna dismissed the writ petition as infructuous since the petitioner did not wish to press the case. No substantive legal issue was decided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16966 of 2017
======================================================
Navdeep Raj Son of Raj Kumar Prasad, resident of Mohalla- Gola Road, Nawada, Police Station- Nawada Sadar, District- Nawada.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Jitendra Kumar Roy, Adv. For the State : Mr. Upendra Pratap Singh, AC to SC-4 For the BSFC : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. Utkarsh Utpal, Adv. ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER
2 07-10-2021
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present writ petition has become infructuous, hence, the petitioner does not wish to press the present writ petition.
The learned counsel for the State, Sri Upendra Pratap Singh (AC to SC-4) and Sri Utkarsh Utpal, AC to Sri Shailendra Kumar Singh, the learned counsel appearing for the RespondentBSFC, are present.
Patna High Court CWJC No.16966 of 2017(2) dt.07-10-2021 2/2
Accordingly, the present writ petition
stands dismissed as not pressed.
(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)
Ajay/-
U
Navdeep Raj
The State Of Bihar
The Managing Director, Bihar state Food and Civil Supply Corporation
The District Magistrate, Nawada
The District Manager, State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. Nawada
Nagina Kumar
Mohit Kumar Shah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
