Awaiting input: The judgment text provided contains only a bare procedural order disposing of a writ petition with liberty to file a revision. It sets conditions for the disposal and specifies timeline for the revision. No substantive legal issue or ground for decision is articulated in the text.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14801 of 2021
======================================================
Sujit Kumar @ Mulayam Kumar, S/o Ramesh Rai R/o Village Jagdishpur, P.S. Ragho Pur, District Vaishali.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rewti Kant Raman, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Vikash Kumar ( SC-11 )
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR) (The proceedings of the Court are being conducted through Video Conferencing and the Advocates joined the proceedings through Video Conferencing from their residence.)
Date : 02-09-2021
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s).
“That this writ application is being filed for quashing the order dated 05.01.2021 passed by the respondent no.2 in Excise Appeal no. 148 of 2020 contained in Annexure-5 by which he has affirmed the order dated 02.06.2020 passed by District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Nawada respondent no.3 in Confiscation Case No. 425 (M)/2019 contained in Annexure-4 by which he has confiscated the Truck of the petitioner bearing Registration no. BR25G-3235.”
Patna High Court CWJC No.14801 of 2021 dt.02-09-2021 2/2
Petitioner has approached this Court without availing the statutory remedy of revision against the impugned appellate order, as such, liberty is granted to petitioner to file revision against the appellate order before the Revisional Authority and if any such Revision is filed within 8 weeks, then Revisional Authority shall condone the delay in filing the revision petition and shall decide the revision petition preferably within 8 weeks from the date of its filing on its own merit.
During pendency of revision petition, confiscated vehicle shall not be auction sold, if not already auction sold.
With aforesaid liberty, the writ petition is disposed of.
(Sanjay Karol, CJ)
( S. Kumar, J)
veena/rajiv-
| AFR/NAFR | NAFR |
|---|---|
| CAV DATE | NA |
| Uploading Date | |
| Transmission Date | NA |
Sujit Kumar @ Mulayam Kumar
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Registration Excise and Prohibition Department Bihar Patna
The Excise Commissioner
Collector Cum District Magistrate, Nawada
Superintendent of Police, Nawada
Excise Superintendent, Nawada
Sanjay Karol
J. S. Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
