Partly allowed

Satyajit v. The State of Bihar through its Principal Secretary

Patna HC16 Aug 2021CWJC/14031/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court directed the District Magistrate to provisionally release the petitioner's motor vehicle, seized while used for transporting illicit liquor, upon production of ownership papers, two sureties, and specific undertakings within 14 days.

What did the court decide?

Direction to District Magistrate to provisionally release the petitioner's motor vehicle within 14 days upon submission of sureties, ownership papers, and undertakings regarding non-alienation and pro

Satyajit Vs The State of Bihar through its Principal… — Property and Title | Patna HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14031 of 2021

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Satyajit, Son of - Majoj Thakur, Resident of Village - Misrauliya, P.S. - Chiraiya, District- East Champaran.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through its Principal Secretary, Department of Excise, Bihar, Patna.

¶7

The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The Collector/ District Magistrate, East Champaran at Motihari.

¶9

The Superintendent of Police, East Champaran, Motihari.

¶10

The S.H.O., P.S. - Dhaka, District- East Champaran.

¶11

... ... Respondent/s

¶12

======================================================

¶13

Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rakesh Kumar No.1, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Kumar Manish (SC-5) Mr. Kumar Pankaj, AC to SC-5

¶14

======================================================

¶15

CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR)

¶16

(The proceedings of the Court are being conducted through Video Conferencing and the Advocates joined the proceedings through Video Conferencing from their residence.)

¶17

Date : 16-08-2021

¶18

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶19

Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s).

¶20

“(i) For of an appropriate writ/writs, direction/directions, order/orders especially in the nature of Mandamus with a direction upon the respondent/respondents to hand over the

¶21

Patna High Court CWJC No.14031 of 2021 dt.16-08-2021 2/3

¶22

petitioner’s motor cycle bearing Engine No. JA06EJFGK08346, Chasis No. MBLJA06AMFGK07135.

¶23

(II) for any other relief/reliefs to which petitioner may be found entitled in the facts and circumstances of the case.”

¶24

It is submitted that 30 bottles, each containing 300

¶25

ml. Nepali liquor was recovered from three motorcycles including motorcycle of petitioner which was stolen on 25.12.2020 for which he had instituted an FIR (Annexure-3) and his stolen vehicle was misused by miscreants for transporting illicit liquor and for which petitioner cannot be held to be responsible.

¶26

In facts and circumstances of present case, District Magistrate/Confiscating Authority, East Champaran at Motihari is directed to provisionally release the vehicle of petitioner after due identification of ownership of the vehicle on production of ownership and registration papers with respect to vehicle in question in his name with two sureties (one local) to the extent of the value of the vehicle as indicated in the insurance document.

¶27

The petitioner while submitting the sureties shall also furnish the following affidavits/undertakings:

¶28

(i) That the petitioner shall not indulge in creating any third party right or interest in respect of the

¶29

Patna High Court CWJC No.14031 of 2021 dt.16-08-2021 3/3

¶30

vehicle during the pendency of the confiscation proceeding and shall not alienate the vehicle during this period.

¶31

(ii) The petitioner shall furnish an undertaking to produce the vehicle before the confiscating authority as and when required.

¶32

(iii) Prior to release of the vehicle, a Panchanama would be prepared wherein the photograph of the vehicle shall be taken and will be certified by the petitioner and same shall be kept on record so that in future if so required, it may be used as a secondary evidence. The petitioner shall furnish an undertaking not to challenge the said Panchanama.

¶33

The release shall be allowed within a period of 14 days from the date of submission of the sureties and the undertakings as stated above, which would however be subject to finalization of the confiscation proceeding.

¶34

With said observations, this writ petition is disposed

¶35

of.

¶36

(Sanjay Karol, CJ)

¶37

( S. Kumar, J)

¶38

veena/rajiv-

¶39

AFR/NAFR	NAFR
CAV DATE	NA
Uploading Date
Transmission Date	NA

Satyajit v. The State of Bihar through its Principal Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Satyajit v. The State of Bihar through its Principal Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anil Ravidas Vs The State of Bihar

Abinash Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Yuva Jagrity Swayam Devi Sahayata Sansthan Vs The State of Bihar

Munna Kumar @ Akhi Ranjan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Nagendra Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Ashok Kumar @ Ashok Kumar Sah Vs The State of Bihar Through the Principal Secretary Department of Excise