The High Court dismissed the petitioner’s application as withdrawn due to his arrest and directed removal of procedural defects within one month.
Application dismissed as withdrawn; defects to be removed within one month.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9919 of 2021
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-146 Year-2019 Thana- LAKHISARAI District- Lakhisarai
======================================================
RAJIV YADAV SON OF JHIGAN YADAV @ JHOGAN YADAV, R/O - KABAIYA, P.S.- KABAIYA, DISTRICT- LAKHISARAI.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Parmanand Pd. Nr. Sahi For the Opposite Party/s : Veena Kumari Jaiswal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY
ORAL ORDER
2 21-12-2021
The learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw this application on account of the fact that it has become infructuous, as the petitioner has been arrested.
Accordingly, this application is dismissed as withdrawn.
The learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove all the defects pointed out by the office within one month.
Office shall ensure that all defects are removed by the petitioner within the stipulated time mentioned hereinabove, failing which, the matter shall be brought to the notice of this Court.
(Nawneet Kumar Pandey , J)
Mahesh/-
U T
Rajiv Yadav
The State of Bihar
Nawneet Kumar Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
