Allowed

Amrendra Kumar Singh @ Amrendra Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC2 Jun 2021CR. MISC./9752/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed the bail application in an excise case. The petitioner, a driver accused of transporting country-made liquor, claimed lack of knowledge regarding the consignment. The court granted bail based on clean antecedents and absence of evidence recovered from the petitioner.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties on similar terms, subject to cooperation in trial.

Amrendra Kumar Singh @ Amrendra Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9752 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1114 Year-2020 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Aurangabad

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Amrendra Kumar Singh @ Amrendra Kumar aged about 30 years (Male) Son of Mithlesh Singh Resident of Village-Kanbehari, P.S.- Muffasil, DistAurangabad

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Pramendra Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Md. Arif,APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶10

2. 02-06-2021

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the parties through video conferencing.

¶12

The petitioner seeks bail in Excise Case No. 1114 of 2020, registered for the offence under Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

¶13

120 liters of country-made liquor has been recovered from a Swift Dzire Car and the petitioner, being driver of the vehicle, was apprehended on the spot.

¶14

It is submitted on behalf of petitioner that nothing has been recovered from conscious possession of the petitioner. Petitioner, being driver of the vehicle, was not aware about the nature of consignment. He was simply driving the car following the instruction of the owner of the car. Petitioner claims clean antecedent and he is in custody since 02.11.2020.

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9752 of 2021(2) dt.02-06-2021 2/2

¶16

Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the bail application.

¶17

Considering the nature of allegation and the fact that nothing has been recovered from conscious possession of petitioner coupled with the fact that petitioner has got clean antecedent, the bail petition of petitioner is allowed. Let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bailbond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional District and Sessions Judge II-cum-Special Judge (Excise), Aurangabad in connection with Excise Case No. 1114 of 2020, on the following conditions:

¶18

“(1) Petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court below and shall remain physically present, as directed by the court below, and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail-bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

¶19

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.”

¶20

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J.)

¶21

anay

¶22

U T

Amrendra Kumar Singh @ Amrendra Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Amrendra Kumar Singh @ Amrendra Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dharikshan Choudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Atif Suleman @ Vicky @ Vicky @ Atif Suleman Vs the State of Bihar

Raju Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Sunita Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Jaswant Bhar Vs The State of Bihar

Shri Lal Mandal @ Lal Mandal @ Srilal Mandal Vs the State of Bihar