Disposed
Md. Mustak @ Md. Mushtak v. The State of Bihar
Patna HCCR. MISC./86479/2019
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.86479 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-160 Year-2018 Thana- KUMAR KHAND District- Madhepura
======================================================
MD. MUSTAK @ MD. MUSHTAK Son of Shealun @ Md. Saloon @ Mohammad Sainul Miya @ Sheelan @ Md. Sailun Resident of Village - Tikulia, P.S.- Kumarkhand, Dist.- Madhepura.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Amarnath Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Nand Kishore Prasad ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA
ORAL ORDER
12 24-03-2021
This record has been listed under the heading “To Be Mentioned” through mentioning slip at the instance of learned counsel for the petitioner.
Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that on 17.03.2021, bail application of the petitioner was rejected, but in the order sheet, the date of order has wrongly been typed as “16-03-2021” in place of “17.03.2021”.
In view of the above submission, in the order no. 11, the date of order is corrected to be read as “17.03.2021” in place of “16.03.2021”.
Accordingly, the same is rectified to the above extent.
(Arvind Srivastava, J)
shailendra/-
U T
MD. MUSTAK @ MD. MUSHTAK
The State of Bihar
Arvind Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court