Hon'ble Justice Sandeep Kumar dismissed the petitioner's application for anticipatory bail arising from PS Case 935 of 2014, Bihta, for the offence under Section 393 IPC, holding it was not a fit case for such relief.
Application for anticipatory bail was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6383 of 2020
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-935 Year-2014 Thana- BIHTA District- Patna
======================================================
VIJAY RAI Son of Laddu Rai @ Ram Ladu Rai Resident of Village - Samalpur, Dariapur, P.S. - Naubatpur, District - Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Bachan Jee Ojha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Mukesh Kumar Singh,, ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
2 03-11-2021
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Bihta P.S. Case No. 935 of 2014 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 393 of the Indian Penal Code.
In the opinion of the Court, this is not a fit case for
grant of anticipatory bail.
It is, thus, dismissed.
(Sandeep Kumar, J)
Saif/- U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted in the present circumstances.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vijay Rai
The State of Bihar
Sandeep Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
